On Sunday, March 4, 2012 7:59:34 PM UTC-5, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
>
> Em 04-03-2012 18:52, Mark Peterson escreveu:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, March 4, 2012 3:33:31 PM UTC-5, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
>>
>> Em 04-03-2012 14:40, Mark Peterson escreveu:
On Sunday, March 4, 2012 3:33:31 PM UTC-5, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
>
> Em 04-03-2012 14:40, Mark Peterson escreveu:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, March 4, 2012 11:08:54 AM UTC-5, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
>>
>> Em 03-03-2012 13:47, Mark Peterson escreveu:
&g
On Sunday, March 4, 2012 11:08:54 AM UTC-5, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
>
> Em 03-03-2012 13:47, Mark Peterson escreveu:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, March 3, 2012 11:42:17 AM UTC-5, kristian wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas &
On Saturday, March 3, 2012 11:42:17 AM UTC-5, kristian wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas >
> > ---
> >
> > class User < ActiveResource::Base
> > self.site = "http://localhost:9000";
> > end"
> > ---
> >
> > I don't call this "lack of syntactic sugar". This is co
On Saturday, March 3, 2012 11:14:08 AM UTC-5, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
>
> Em 03-03-2012 12:41, Mark Peterson escreveu:
>
> On Saturday, March 3, 2012 9:23:16 AM UTC-5, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
> wrote:
>>
>> Given the code below, it seems you're j
On Saturday, March 3, 2012 10:47:09 AM UTC-5, Matt jones wrote:
>
>
> This looks to be a variant of issue #2692:
>
> https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/2692
>
> although the patch in that instance wouldn't fix this bug, as the
> detection heuristic will guess that image_page is a root element t
On Saturday, March 3, 2012 9:27:58 AM UTC-5, Dheeraj Kumar wrote:
>
> Rodrigo has made a very important point about which list to use.
>
> How do to X with rails -> rubyonrails-talk
> How rails does X -> rails-core
>
I'm pointing out something that changed, and would break my project if I
upgrade,
On Saturday, March 3, 2012 9:23:16 AM UTC-5, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
>
> Given the code below, it seems you're just starting using Rails and you
> still don't understand Rails basic concepts.
>
> Shouldn't you consider posting in the user's mailing list first? It's
> more likely that you'l
Though it's less than likely a resource would return with no "id" (or only
1 attribute), I think that it needs to be considered. It's rare to find
perfect CRUD.
Imagine that User.find(123) was actually
CoolViews.find("aggregateOfAllHotTopics"). I guess that the service could
supply an "id" of
blem.
Is there a mission statement for this mailing list? If there is, I don't
see it.
On Friday, March 2, 2012 11:47:24 PM UTC-5, SpaceGhost wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Mark Peterson
> wrote:
> > On Friday, March 2, 2012 9:25:06 PM UTC-5, thewoo...@gmai
On Friday, March 2, 2012 9:25:06 PM UTC-5, thewoo...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> "M" is the mute thread shortcut in gmail:
>
> http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=47787
>
> Don't feed the trolls.
>
> Yes, block your ears as users express their concerns.
--
You received this message
And I should add, though it was difficult to get myself into this fail
case, It was amazingly quick to set up 2 codebases and servers to perform
this task.
Great work people! :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group.
To view
Took longer than I thought to get a basic use case that fails. Scenario 2
below is the failure:
My Code:
class User < ActiveResource::Base
self.site = "http://localhost:9000";
end
class Image < ActiveResource::Base
end
class ImagePage < ActiveResource::Base
self.element_name = "image_page"
On Friday, March 2, 2012 7:43:35 PM UTC-5, Aaron Patterson wrote:
>
>
> Can you show a code example?
>
> --
> Aaron Patterson
> http://tenderlovemaking.com/
>
Sure, I'll create a fresh project to juxtapose the problem this causes with
GET and POST on the same model.
--
You received this mess
On Friday, March 2, 2012 7:25:34 PM UTC-5, Aaron Patterson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 01:26:18PM -0800, Mark Peterson wrote:
> > So ActiveResource::Base.include_root_in_json is no longer supported, and
> > then I encounter the following within Json Format
On Friday, March 2, 2012 7:19:15 PM UTC-5, Ryan Bigg wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, 2 March 2012 at 4:06 PM, Andrés Mejía wrote:
>
> I don't mean to offend, but you are one of the most annoying people to
> ever write to this list.
>
> Fire, meet gasoline.
>
> i.e. This is not the way to deal with peo
On Friday, March 2, 2012 7:09:54 PM UTC-5, eMxyzptlk wrote:
>
> lool I second that, he's like nil always whining :)
>
> Sorry dude not offending you, but clearly you woke up on the wrong side of
> the bed and decided to take it out on the most respectful list, which
> usually people don't even
On Friday, March 2, 2012 7:06:34 PM UTC-5, Andrés Mejía wrote:
>
> I don't mean to offend, but you are one of the most annoying people to
> ever write to this list.
>
>
I'm certainly not offended. Thanks!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rai
On Friday, March 2, 2012 5:37:17 PM UTC-5, Mark Peterson wrote:
>
> On Friday, March 2, 2012 5:25:30 PM UTC-5, Prem Sichanugrist wrote:
>>
>> Oh, I put the period in the `` because the sentence ended there. Sorry if
>> that's confused you.
>>
>> The co
On Friday, March 2, 2012 5:25:30 PM UTC-5, Prem Sichanugrist wrote:
>
> Oh, I put the period in the `` because the sentence ended there. Sorry if
> that's confused you.
>
> The correct code is this:
>
> some_method(name: 'bob', age: 25)
>
> - Prem
>
Any programmer worth his salt disobeys the i
On Friday, March 2, 2012 5:14:58 PM UTC-5, Prem Sichanugrist wrote:
>
> There's a mistyped there in the code. It has to be `name:`, not `name.`
>
I'm scared does "name." mean something? For all I know it does now :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "R
On Friday, March 2, 2012 5:14:16 PM UTC-5, Trek wrote:
>
> >
> > Isn't "name 'bob'" the syntax for passing "bob" as an argument into the
> "name" method? Or has that all changed too?
> >
> > If I saw "name 'bob'", I would think that there's a method named "name"
> defined somewhere.
> >
> > d
On Friday, March 2, 2012 4:21:39 PM UTC-5, eMxyzptlk wrote:
>
> Just taking a long breath to answer you, this syntax change is not
> pointless, it's a preparation for syntax like this:
>
> some_method(name 'bob', age: 25)
>
> in some_methods, the arguments is not a *hash* but they are named params
On Friday, March 2, 2012 4:35:22 PM UTC-5, Ryan Bigg wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, 2 March 2012 at 12:15 PM, Mark Peterson wrote:
>
> You've got to be kidding? Why do these people waste their time with such
> pointless syntactical changes
>
>
> This is what would b
On Friday, March 2, 2012 4:21:39 PM UTC-5, eMxyzptlk wrote:
>
> Just taking a long breath to answer you, this syntax change is not
> pointless, it's a preparation for syntax like this:
>
> some_method(name 'bob', age: 25)
>
> in some_methods, the arguments is not a *hash* but they are named params
On Friday, March 2, 2012 4:20:50 PM UTC-5, Michael Pavling wrote:
>
> On 2 March 2012 21:18, Mark Peterson wrote:
> > Again, not sure where you got the "rage" from.
> >
>
> I tend to get it from top-posting with no trimming ;-)
>
So that's what top-pos
So ActiveResource::Base.include_root_in_json is no longer supported, and
then I encounter the following within Json Formats:
module ActiveResource
module Formats
module JsonFormat
def decode(json)
Formats.remove_root(ActiveSupport::JSON.decode(json))
end
end
end
en
th old syntax by using
> --old-style-hash.
> * That wrap_parameters thing is something else altogether. It's for when
> you're calling `@model.to_json`.
>
> - Prem
>
> On Mar 2, 2012, at 3:15 PM, Mark Peterson wrote:
>
> You've got to be kidding? Why do th
Not sure where you got the "rage" from.
On Friday, March 2, 2012 3:27:12 PM UTC-5, Michael Koziarski wrote:
>
> On Saturday, 3 March 2012 at 9:15 AM, Mark Peterson wrote:
>
> You've got to be kidding? Why do these people waste their time with such
> pointless syntac
disable this by setting
:format to an empty array.
On Friday, March 2, 2012 2:31:18 PM UTC-5, Prem Sichanugrist wrote:
>
> No, that is Ruby 1.9 hash syntax. It will generate that syntax if you're
> using Ruby 1.9.
>
> - Prem
>
> On Mar 2, 2012, at 1:31 PM, Mark Pe
session_store.rb
is:
YourApplicationName::Application.config.session_store :cookie_store, key:
'_yourapplicationname_session'
should be:
YourApplicationName::Application.config.session_store :cookie_store, :key
=> '_yourapplicationname_session'
wrap_parameters.rb
is:
wrap_parameters format:
31 matches
Mail list logo
