getting some feedback from the core community to see if
this is both interesting and useful.
Thoughts?
Sincerely,
Anthony Eden
--
GMU/IT d- s: a32 C++()$ UL@ P--- L+(++) !E W+++$ !N o? K? w--- !O
M++ V PS+ PE Y PGP t+ !5 X- R tv b++ DI+ D++ G- e++ h r+++ y**
http://anthony.mp
--
You
drop me a line!
I've contributed in the past but do not see my name. It has been quite
some time though.
Sincerely,
Anthony Eden
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group
On 8/31/07, Jay Levitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Since my last proposal was so roundly applauded...
>
> Today, Rails templates all use the filename extensions of their target
> files - a template that will become an .rb file ends in .rb.
>
> But they're not .rb files; they're .erb files. The
On 8/20/07, Piyush Ranjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > This reminds me to ask, are we gonna get rid of most of the adapters
> > from core for 2.0 ? I guess, only mysql and postgres and may be sqlite
> > deserves to be in core. Other adapter might be better off as external
> > libs.
>
> Sho
Please use the Rails Talk list for questions like this:
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk
The core list is primarily for discussion of changes to the Rails core and
not for questions about Rails itself. Thanks!
V/r
Anthony Eden
On 7/15/07, gneeot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm not really feeling it. Connecting to multiple database instances
to provide greater database scaling should be transparent. It seems to
me that *that* was Alex's biggest gripe. I'd rather see the
transparency either a.) at the adapter level or b.) through the use of
load balancing (load balanc
On 2/24/07, Michael Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2/24/07, Anthony Eden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Following up on Koz's suggestion to discuss how plugin developers are
> > monkey patching AR, I'd like to share some of thin
place_bind_variables
replace_named_bind_variables
quote_bound_value
raise_if_bind_arity_mismatch
V/r
Anthony Eden
--
Cell: 808 782-5046
Current Location: Melbourne, FL
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
Just want to poke a little and remind core about my clean logger patch
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/7106. It still patches cleanly so
it'd be cool if it could be applied now while the getting is good.
Thanks!
V/r
Anthony Eden
--
Cell: 808 782-5046
Current Location: Melbourn
/r
Anthony Eden
--
Cell: 808 782-5046
Current Location: Melbourne, FL
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@google
ris-2.11-i86pc/egg/tracspamfilter/adapters.py",
line 37, in validate_ticket
File "build/bdist.solaris-2.11-i86pc/egg/tracspamfilter/api.py",
line 78, in test
File "build/bdist.solaris-2.11-i86pc/egg/tracspamfilter/filters/regex.py",
line 39, in test
TypeError: expected
Patch #7282 (http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/7382) provides a fix to
fixtures.rb so that setup_fixture_accessors respects custom table
names when set_fixture_class is used. This is another fix in my
continued work with multiple databases and fixtures.
V/r
Anthony Eden
--
Cell: 808 782-5046
discuss this until we're blue in the face. At the end
of the day what matters is how we behave. To that end *I* will
continue to follow my own advice as to how to handle tickets for
Rails, and I encourage others to do the same, if for no other reason
than to contribute more test cover
at by
providing a test case anyone would be able to prove it on their own
environment, including the original author of the issue should they
still be experiencing the problem.
V/r
Anthony Eden
On 1/24/07, Thijs van der Vossen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 24, 2007, at 17:51, A
> reporter to prove the bug exists as best as possible.
>
> - rob
At least close it with untested if this is the case. Closing with
wontfix or worksforme is not the appropriate response, IMO.
V/r
Anthony Eden
--
Cell: 808 782-5046
Current Location: Melbourne, FL
--~--~-~--~-
;t know what the closer's assumptions were, and
the point of test cases is to define something which can be applied
repeatedly with the same assumptions and which results in the same
outcome.
I think if an issue can be legitimately closed with a passing test
case then the onus does reasonab
closing we get the
benefit of proof, plus the framework gets better test coverage and the
test can provide the basis for additional tests in the future if more
information is provided for the issue.
Any thoughts on this? Does this seem like a reasonable thing to do?
V/r
Anthony Eden
--
Cell:
ve to deal with as well if
multiple databases are used from within an application.
V/r
Anthony Eden
--
Cell: 808 782-5046
Current Location: Melbourne, FL
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
row count.
So please, will someone in core explain the expected behavior and can
the execute() documentation in the DatabaseStatements module be
updated to reflect the required behavior. Thanks.
V/r
Anthony Eden
--
Cell: 808 782-5046
Current Location: Melbourne, FL
ests correctly first before I
go and try to patch the Postgres driver.
Right now I'm just executing with:
rake test_postgresql
Thanks.
V/r
Anthony Eden
--
Cell: 808 782-5046
Current Location: Melbourne, FL
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message beca
Is there some one who is responsible for deleting old spam comments
from dev.rubyonrails.org? I've come across a couple while going
through the open tickets and I'd love to be able to just get rid of
the spam, or notify a maintainer who can get rid of it, rather than
ignore it.
V/r
An
t;
> ... I'm not sure. Convince me, because we're using views with
> legacy-style databases at the moment, and if anything can be done make
> this simpler, I'm definitely interested.
>
> - James
> On 1/12/07, Anthony Eden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> &g
PostgreSQL. Is there any interest in
eventually moving this code into ActiveRecord or should it just remain
as an extension gem/plugin?
If there is interest to bring it into the AR core then I can create
the patches for it.
Thoughts?
V/r
Anthony Eden
--
Cell: 808 782-5046
Current Location: Melbourne
s and submitting patches as I complete them.
Also, if anyone would prefer that I do something different in my
documentation patches than what I am doing now, please let me know.
V/r
Anthony Eden
--
Cell: 808 782-5046
Current Location: Melbourn
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/6561
I've tried repeatedly to modify my code to *not* raise the error, but
have been unsuccessful so far. I included a new patch as well which
modified AR rather than AS. If it can be applied I'd be thrilled.
V/r
Anthony Eden
On 12/27/06, Jonath
ed to edge I would greatly appreciate it.
Sincerely,
Anthony Eden
--
Cell: 808 782-5046
Current Location: Melbourne, FL
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Core" group.
To pos
I just updated to the latest revision (5445) and ran rake for ActiveSupport and received the following failures: 1) Failure:test_autoload_doesnt_shadow_name_error(DependenciesTest) [./test/dependencies_test.rb:662:in `test_autoload_doesnt_shadow_name_error'
./test/dependencies_test.rb:655:
I am receiving the following non-fatal error from Rails for a particular action:Error calling Dispatcher.dispatch #./script/../config/../vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:313:in `to_constant_name'
./script/../config/../vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/depend
Adam,They are mapped in actionpack/lib/action_controller/resources.rbV/rAnthonyOn 9/20/06, Adam Greene <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:ah, I just ran into this today when I was checking the validity of my
xhtml.core team, is this just an omission? If so, Jarkko, I would definitelybe willing to help you
It still seems wrong to me, since the resource is the same, just a
different representation of it, and thus it would seem that they
should be represented by the same URI.
If the decision has already been made then so be it, I can live with
it, but I still question it.
Sincerely,
Anthony Eden
I was just browsing through the ActiveResource code and I wonder why
the use of .xml throughout on the URLs? Wouldn't it make more sense to
just have ActiveResource set the content type to application/xml and
then use paths without the extensions?
Sincerely,
Anthony
31 matches
Mail list logo
