Yes, of course, you're right. I had been thinking of the edit
scenario in fields_for (which I think would be cool if it did what I
suggested when passed true). The excitement of the coincidence
confused me, and I didn't really read properly that you were talking
about new objects.
+1 on
I'm not sure about passing :index => true since form_for passes along the
value of index to fields_for...
It seems like this is already the case for forms when the object is not a
new object, i.e.
form_for(@user) . etc
yields
wrote:
> Ok, this is bizarre timing. I was thinking about this
I found the solution, at least in my case. I have a class defined in
test/mock/development that uses 'require' vs. 'require_dependency'.
Changing to require_dependency fixed the problem, which I can
understand. I was not (at least it seemed) seeing the same error in
test env, where I was using the
I got the first one fixed on my fork. I will ask someone to merge it.
On Sep 21, 10:21 am, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
wrote:
> Chad Woolley escreveu:> Hi Rodrigo, I can provide some info...
>
> > ...
>
> >> 2 - actionpack: I can't run any test and I get this message: "no such
> >> file to load -- r
Chad Woolley escreveu:
> Hi Rodrigo, I can provide some info...
>
> ...
>
>> 2 - actionpack: I can't run any test and I get this message: "no such
>> file to load -- rack". But I do have rack 1.0.0 and rack-test 0.5.0 and
>> they load with no errors on irb.
>>
>
> ActionPack uses Bundler (h
