Cheers,
John Trupiano wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Is this the recommended procedure for executing multiple SQL
> statements in a single call? http://www.seanr.ca/tech/?p=75
>
> In other words, do we have a config option to trun on
> CLIENT_MULTI_STATEMENTS for MySQL?
I'm very happy that this is
Hrmmthis is not for max packet size, this is to allow the MySQL
Adapter to execute multiple statements in a single call to execute(),
e.g.
CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE temp_pets (
`id` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment,
`child_id` int(11) NOT NULL default '0',
`pets_name` int(11) NOT NULL defau
Anyone have issues with the change we are proposing in this ticket?
http://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/1752-added-using_connection-method-like-with_connection-but-sets-it-as-default-connection-while-inside-the-block
Basically we want to change AR::B#connection to accept a block.
I believe that you can override this with a client setting in my.cnf
or the user-specific mysql settings. By not providing a value in
rails we just fall back to the user / system wide settings. Max packet
size isn't really something I think we need in the database.yml.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:
Hi,
I'm refactoring some code related to autosaving associations.
While doing this, I came across some code which doesn't seem to do
anything, or rather, no tests fail when this code is disabled.
http://github.com/rails/rails/blob/b6e56efe07cb3c2e999216f995403aa9206226a2/activerecord/lib/active
Hey guys,
Is this the recommended procedure for executing multiple SQL
statements in a single call? http://www.seanr.ca/tech/?p=75
In other words, do we have a config option to trun on
CLIENT_MULTI_STATEMENTS for MySQL? Or are we still being advised to
go directly into the rails source to achi
Hi,
I submitted a patch to lighthouse which allows users of
ActiveResource::HttpMock to relax the strictness of the request
matching algorithm in cases when exact matching of path or request
headers is not required for the purposes of the test.
See the patch at:
http://rails.lighthouseapp.com/
Hi guys,
I've been seeing lots of commits lately without tests, for instance:
http://github.com/rails/rails/commit/b6e56efe07cb3c2e999216f995403aa9206226a2
http://github.com/rails/rails/commit/238a6bb62dc153743a0abc6eb1e35392ac799d65
http://github.com/rails/rails/commit/1dab1d380377f1a2
