Personally, I can't recall ever having needed a stand-alone DB adapter
library, so I can't be of much help there.
On Sep 10, 7:28 pm, 7rans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 10, 1:53 am, August Lilleaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Greetings,
>
> > At RailsConf Europe 2008, I spent some tim
Excellent Geoff! That does the trick (and is cleaner than the
massaging I was doing at the controller level in the meantime).
I figured it would be a very straightforward adjustment in rails (the
long-term fix, that is).
-John
On Sep 10, 6:50 pm, Geoff B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
Hi John,
We figured out the issue was the combination of time-only columns and
multiparameter attributes -- AR::Base#instantiate_time_object is
currently doing a time zone conversion for time-only columns, but it
shouldn't be.
I'll try to pull in a fix for this in soon (should be simple, we just
Pratik,
Got it - I figured it was prep time for 2.2... I for one would like
to see this reapplied and iterated on after 2.2 is tagged as it really
helps out with multi-model forms.
Best,
Zack
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Pratik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Zach,
>
> The :accessible ch
Hey Zach,
The :accessible change was not complete and still needs some more work to be
usable. There was no conclusion about how we want updates to work -
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core/browse_thread/thread/4049b4b313fa8be2/730dbd7ad5e7ccc0
As 2.2 is very close, I didn't want any
I noticed that Pratik just reverted the ":accessible option to allow
for allowing mass assignments" with the following commit:
http://github.com/rails/rails/commit/9994f0d90248db7d7eae36f0b597a15e8a427612
What was the reason behind this reversion?
I've been using the feature and it works great f
Hey Geoff, Liam,
I'm running into the same issue, and it's very simple to create an
example.
1) $> rails time_select_problem
2) $> cd time_select_problem
3) $> ruby script/generate scaffold stores name:string opens:time
4) Edit config/environment.rb, set config.time_zone = 'Eastern Time
(US & Ca
On Sep 10, 1:53 am, August Lilleaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> At RailsConf Europe 2008, I spent some time playing with my own
> implementation of ActiveModel. Most of the validations stuff has been
> implemented now, so I think it's ready to be shared with the
> community.
>
>
Decided to remove ActiveModel::Callbacks alltogether. What exactly
should it do, anyway? For the purpose of making validations work, I'd
say it's overkill. Perhaps there's something I haven't though of.
On Sep 10, 9:58 am, August Lilleaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Regarding the callback librar
On 10 Sep 2008, at 11:58, Hongli Lai wrote:
>
> On Sep 10, 12:57 pm, Hongli Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sep 9, 7:53 pm, Frederick Cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Just to follow up on this (not that I've had time to touch this
>>> since
>>> last week), what do people think
On Sep 10, 12:57 pm, Hongli Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 9, 7:53 pm, Frederick Cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Just to follow up on this (not that I've had time to touch this since
> > last week), what do people think we could do with this that would be
> > useful ?
>
> >
On Sep 9, 7:53 pm, Frederick Cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Just to follow up on this (not that I've had time to touch this since
> last week), what do people think we could do with this that would be
> useful ?
>
> Fred
It might be useful for lazy loading from the database inside cached
Regarding the callback library in ActiveModel. I just started working
on that as a stand-alone implementation of callback functionality. But
I guess using ActiveSupport::Callbacks makes sense here?
On Sep 10, 7:53 am, August Lilleaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> At RailsConf Europe
13 matches
Mail list logo
