Dear OOAM Authors,
I have read the two OOAM drafts, and I have some comments. Please see below.
Comments about draft-ooamdt-rtgwg-ooam-requirement:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ooamdt-rtgwg-ooam-requirement-00
A general question about the draft: does the draft define requirements for
oper
m another draft, and
is not applicable to this document.
Cheers,
Tal.
>-Original Message-
>From: Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar) [mailto:naiku...@cisco.com]
>Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2016 5:16 PM
>To: Tal Mizrahi; draft-ooamdt-rtgwg-oam-gap-analy...@tools.ietf.org; draft-
&g
Hi,
The following sentence caught my attention in the RTGWG discussion
about inclusive language in RFC5798 bis
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/113/materials/slides-113-rtgwg-3-vrrp-5798bis-01):
"Please don’t make alternate suggestions without
detailed knowledge of both the VRRP protocol
and
/en/group/rtg/RtgDir
Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection-11
Reviewer: Tal Mizrahi
Review Date: August 2, 2023
Intended Status: Standards Track
Summary:
I have concerns about this document. It needs more work before being
submitted to the IESG.
Main comments:
- Reading the document
