RE: Charter Update (Discussion)

Hi, With Andras's comments incorporated looks good to me. Regards, Jeff From: rtgwg-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:rtgwg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mike Shand Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 9:34 AM To: rtgwg@ietf.org Subject: Re: Charter Update (Discussion) That seems to describe what the WG do

Re: Charter Update (Discussion)

I believe we are looking for a solution providing 100% coverage for both IP only and IP/MPLS networks with emphasis on full coverage. Regards, Jeff On Nov 16, 2011, at 8:20 AM, "Eric Osborne (eosborne)" wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: rtgwg-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:rtgwg-

Re: Charter Update (Discussion)

IMHO it just wouldn't make sense to do "IP or MPLS only" FRR. While majority uses MPLS we can't ignore those who can't / won't do so. I think we should clearly separate between full coverage but more complex to implement solutions ie MRT or FN vs partial coverage but relatively easier to impleme

Re: Charter Update (Discussion)

Eric, Self-rephrasing - if a solution to provide 100% coverage is topology dependent then it simply doesn't provide 100%, there's no "right topology" to apply to every network. However - if you look at rtgwg agenda - there are at least 2 proposals to provide 100% coverage in virtually any topo

RE: Charter Update (Discussion)

Eric, What I meant with "virtually" is that there must be a backup in order to use one, there is no uncovered 2%. Regards, Jeff -Original Message- From: Eric Osborne (eosborne) [mailto:eosbo...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 17:45 To: Jeff Tantsura Cc: Stew

RE: Adoption of the MRT Architecture Draft as WG Document

Hi, Yes/support Regards, Jeff From: rtgwg-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:rtgwg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Retana, Alvaro Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 7:56 AM To: rtgwg@ietf.org Subject: Adoption of the MRT Architecture Draft as WG Document Hi! As discussed at the meeting in Taipei, this e-ma

RE: opinions on adoption of draft-shand-remote-lfa as a WG draft

Hi Alia, Support for exactly these reasons. Regards, Jeff -Original Message- From: rtgwg-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:rtgwg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John E Drake Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 12:27 PM To: Alia Atlas; rtgwg@ietf.org Subject: RE: opinions on adoption of draft-shand-remote

RE: poll on draft-karan-mofrr-02 to become a WG draft

Hi Alia, Yes/support, having product implementation since 2009. There's an IPR associated with the draft: (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=document_search&document_search=draft-karan-mofrr) Regards, Jeff -Original Message- From: rtgwg-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:rtgwg-boun.

Re: needed improvements to Remote LFA draft

Hi, I agree with Alia's analysis of the current state of the draft. I'd propose that someone, perhaps Clarence re-runs RFC6571 to include rLFA. Regards, Jeff On Aug 12, 2012, at 5:39, "Alia Atlas" wrote: > There are several improvements that I would like to see to > draft-ietf-rtgwg-remote-lfa

Re: identifying IP address of targeted LDP session in draft-ietf-rtgwg-remote-lfa-00

Agree with Les, why reinvent the wheel? Regards, Jeff On Dec 13, 2012, at 20:36, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" wrote: > Hannes - > >> >> should be go down and spin off dedicated drafts for OSPF and IS-IS to >> explicitly advertise the >> transport IP address ? > > Speaking specifically about IS-

Re: Expiration impending:

Same here Regards, Jeff On Feb 6, 2013, at 3:14 PM, "Andrew G. Malis" mailto:andrew.g.ma...@verizon.com>> wrote: I agree with Curtis' suggested plan to advance CL Requirements now and continue work on the other two drafts. Cheers, Andy On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Curtis Villamizar mai

Re: WG Adoption Requested for draft-litkowski-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-01

Yes/support Regards, Jeff On Apr 2, 2013, at 7:18 PM, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" mailto:aret...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi! The authors of 'Operational management of Loop Free Alternates' (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-litkowski-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-01) have requested that rtgwg adopt their

Re: please read and comment on the MTU problems in draft-liu-rtgwg-mtu-config-ps

Alia, Would be great to have documented how different vendors interpret MTU, btw most also have implemented different flavors of "ignore mtu" knobs for their IGPs. Both informational or BCP would do. Regards, Jeff On Jul 25, 2013, at 8:24 PM, "Alia Atlas" mailto:akat...@gmail.com>> wrote: Ca

Re: WG Adoption of MRT Algorithms Draft (draft-enyedi-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm)

Yes/support Regards, Jeff On Sep 27, 2013, at 5:53 AM, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" mailto:aret...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi! This message starts a two-week Call for WG Adoption for 'Algorithms for computing Maximally Redundant Trees for IP/LDP Fast-Reroute' (draft-enyedi-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm).

Request for review - draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-01.txt

Hi, Question to the authors of the draft about their intentions, obviously the basic node protection equation(D_opt(Npq, Dst) < D_opt(Npq, Np) + Distance_opt(Np, Dst)) is correct, however the rest is more or less implementation details. So if the authors would like to share the details about their

Re: Request for review - draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-01.txt

Atlas mailto:akat...@gmail.com>> Date: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 5:26 AM To: Hannes Gredler mailto:han...@juniper.net>> Cc: Jeff Tantsura mailto:jeff.tants...@ericsson.com>>, "rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>" mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: Reques

Re: Request for review - draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-01.txt

Atlas mailto:akat...@gmail.com>> Date: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 5:26 AM To: Hannes Gredler mailto:han...@juniper.net>> Cc: Jeff Tantsura mailto:jeff.tants...@ericsson.com>>, "rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>" mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: Reques

Re: WG Adoption of MRT Algorithms Draft (draft-enyedi-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm)

Hi Alvaro, I support adoption of the draft as it provides base for number of solutions we (rtgwg) have been building using mrt. Cheers, Jeff From: Alvaro Retana mailto:aret...@cisco.com>> Date: Tuesday, October 8, 2013 11:23 AM To: "rtgwg@ietf.org" mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>

Re: WG Adoption of MRT Algorithms Draft (draft-enyedi-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm)

Agree with both comments. Cheers, Jeff From: Alia Atlas mailto:akat...@gmail.com>> Date: Wednesday, October 9, 2013 7:29 AM To: Gábor Sándor Enyedi mailto:gabor.sandor.eny...@ericsson.com>> Cc: "rtgwg@ietf.org" mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: WG Adoption of MRT Algor

Re: process questions about draft-ietf-rtgwg-mofrr-03

Hi Alia, Yes, we have got an implementation. Thanks! Regards, Jeff > On Jan 24, 2014, at 3:37 PM, "Alia Atlas" wrote: > > Is the intended status still Informational? > Are there any implementations? > > Thanks, > Alia > ___ > rtgwg mailing list > rt

Re: RTGWG chairs

ng AD so it is not appropriate for her to continue to chair a WG in >>the >>Routing Area. Thus, she will be stepping down as co-chair of RTGWG. >> >>I have consulted with Alvaro, Stewart, and Alia, and have decided to >>appoint >>Jeff Tantsura to serve in this ro

IETF 89 RTGWG WG Meeting Minutes

Hi, IETF 89 RTGWG WG meeting minutes have been uploaded to http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/89/minutes/minutes-89-rtgwg Thanks to Acee Linden for taking the minutes. Enjoy Cheers, Jeff ___ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman

Re: IPR Claims related to draft-ietf-rtgwg-mofrr

Hi Alvaro, There's IPR statement disclosed. I'm not aware of any others Cheers, Jeff From: Alvaro Retana mailto:aret...@cisco.com>> Date: Thursday, March 13, 2014 9:38 PM To: "draft-ietf-rtgwg-mo...@tools.ietf.org" mailto:draft-ietf-rtgwg-mo...@to

Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-rtgwg-mofrr

Hi, Yes/support (as contributor) There are 3 implementations out there. Cheers, Jeff From: Alvaro Retana mailto:aret...@cisco.com>> Date: Thursday, March 13, 2014 9:35 PM To: "rtgwg@ietf.org" mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>> Cc: "draft-ietf-rtgwg-mo...@tools.ietf.org

volunteers to take on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-ip-mib work

Hi, Following our discussion in London - I'm looking for volunteers to take on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-ip-mib work. Thanks! Cheers, Jeff ___ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

What makes for a quality RFC presentation

For your information, the link below is to a presentation Adrian gave to the MPLS working group on producing drafts that are going to RFC. Some of the thoughts are specific to MPLS. But most of them are widely applicable. http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/89/slides/slides-89-mpls-15.pptx Cheers

Re: IPR Claims related to draft-ietf-rtgwg-mofrr

Alvaro, This is the one. Thanks! Regards, Jeff On Mar 27, 2014, at 9:52 AM, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" mailto:aret...@cisco.com>> wrote: On 3/14/14 1:32 PM, "Jeff Tantsura" mailto:jeff.tants...@ericsson.com>> wrote: Jeff: Hi! There's IPR statement d

FW: YANG Advice and Editing Session at the next IETF meeting

Hi, If you are interested on YANG related work please come and join. Cheers, Jeff > >> -Original Message- >> From: iesg [mailto:iesg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benoit Claise >> Sent: 13 May 2014 22:53 >> To: undisclosed-recipients: >> Subject: YANG Advice and Editing Session at the

FW: Improving and Restructuring the Routing Area

Dear rtgwgers, Please be aware of the ongoing effort to improve the IETF Routing Area , please also note that discussion will happen on routing-discuss...@ietf.org. So if you want to participate then please join that list. Cheers, Jeff -- Forwarded message -- From: Alia Atlas m

IETF 90 RTGWG Agenda

Hi RTGWG: The agenda for IETF 90 RTGWG has been posted: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/90/agenda/rtgwg Looking forward to seeing you in Toronto! Cheers, Jeff ___ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Re: IETF 90 RTGWG Agenda

Hi Stewart, Will update agenda in a moment. Thanks for pointing out! Cheers, Jeff -Original Message- From: Stewart Bryant Reply-To: "stbry...@cisco.com" Date: Monday, July 14, 2014 at 3:24 AM To: Qin Wu , Jeff Tantsura , "rtgwg@ietf.org" Subject: Re: IETF 90 R

Re: WG review for draft-lapukhov-bgp-routing-large-dc

Hi, Both, this document and abno are architectural frameworks and to my thinking rtgwg as a good home for those. I'm glad to see support from the AD's here! To second Alia - please do express your support/ lack of such, we would like the decision to be driven by consensus (so far only "support"

Re: WG review for draft-lapukhov-bgp-routing-large-dc

Hi Petr, While creating the blueprint you must have considered different options, eBGP vs iBGP, mixed, summarization (different places), MPLS over foo, etc Would be great if you could elaborate why the design looks the way it is. Thanks! Cheers, Jeff From: Petr Lapukhov mailto:p...@fb.com>> Da

IETF90 RTGWG minutes - http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/90/minutes/minutes-90-rtgarea

Hi, Please find the minutes at http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/90/minutes/minutes-90-rtgarea. Thanks to Acee Lindem for taking the notes! Cheers, Jeff ___ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Re: IETF90 RTGWG minutes - http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/90/minutes/minutes-90-rtgwg

uv > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Jeff Tantsura > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Please find the minutes at >> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/90/minutes/minutes-90-rtgarea. >> >> Thanks to Acee Lindem for taking the notes! >> >> Cheers, &g

Re: Call for review draft-farrkingel-pce-abno-architecture

Uma, Can I take your comments as a positive vote to adoption of the draft by rtgwg? Thanks! Regards, Jeff > On Jul 31, 2014, at 9:03 PM, "Uma Chunduri" wrote: > > Dear Authors, > >> This I-D is a bit of an architecture and a bit an applicability statement. >> It spans quite a lot of IETF te

Re: IPR Claims related to draft-lapukhov-bgp-routing-large-dc

Hi authors, Please re-publish you draft as a rtgwg draft. Going forward I’ll be the shepherd for the draft. Please do plan to present at IETF91 and request a slot in advance. Thanks and welcome to rtgwg! Cheers, Jeff From: Alvaro Retana mailto:aret...@cisco.com>> Date: Thursday, August 7, 2014

Re: rtgwg Rechartering

Hi Bruno, Please see inline Cheers, Jeff From: "bruno.decra...@orange.com" mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>> Date: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 at 1:27 AM To: Alvaro Retana mailto:aret...@cisco.com>>, "rtgwg-cha...@tools.ietf.org

Re: Adrian Farrel's Yes on charter-ietf-rtgwg-04-02: (with COMMENT)

Agree, I think having in the text "routing-related" only would suffice while preventing possible confusion. Regards, Jeff > On Oct 2, 2014, at 6:43 PM, Benoit Claise wrote: > >> On 30/09/2014 21:20, Adrian Farrel wrote: >> Adrian Farrel has entered the following ballot position for >> charter-

Working Group last call on draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability

All, We are starting a working group last call on the subject document. Please share any information available about existing implementations. WGLC will end at Noon PST on November 24 2014. Please review the document and send any final comments prior to the WGLC deadline. Cheers, Jeff __

Working Group last call on draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability - IPR

All, In parallel to the WGLC for this draft, I want to formally ask the authors (no additional contributors are listed in the latest version of the draft) to please respond to this message indicating whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft will not progress (pending the result

Re: Working Group last call on draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability

? Happy New Year! Cheers, Jeff -Original Message- From: Jeff Tantsura Date: Monday, November 10, 2014 at 10:56 AM To: "rtgwg@ietf.org" Cc: Alvaro Retana Subject: Working Group last call on draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability >All, > >We are starting a working gro

Re: Working Group last call on draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability

itkow...@orange.com" Date: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 at 2:11 AM To: Jeff Tantsura , "rtgwg@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageabil...@tools.ietf.org" Cc: Alvaro Retana Subject: RE: Working Group last call on draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability >Hi Folks, > >First

Re: RtgDir review: draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases-06.txt

Hi Curtis, Please let me know how would you like to proceed with the draft. If you feel it should progress and since Routing Directorate is done with no issues found - please resubmit, I¹ll provide writeup and submit to the IESG. Thanks! Cheers, Jeff -Original Message- From: Curtis V

RTGWG timeslots for Dallas

Hi RTGWG, IETF92 is approaching, please request a timeslot if you are planning to present, usual disclaimer applies - no draft/no time. Thanks! Cheers, Jeff ___ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Re: LFA manageability : per AF config => feedback required

Hi Stephane, /chair hat off IMO in disjoined topologies one should have flexibility to enable/disable LFA as per AF. Cheers, Jeff From: "stephane.litkow...@orange.com" mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>> Date: Thursday, February 19, 2015 at 11:21 PM T

Re: LFA manageability : per AF config => feedback required

on as to what an implementation should provide. If a given > | >|implementer thinks this is either too onerous or not useful they can > omit > | >|it w/o being in violation. But I see no reason to eliminate this - > and in > | >|actual practice I would expect

Re: LFA manageability : per AF config => feedback required

agine cases in which the per AF enabling might make >>>> sense (e.g. >>>> | >|when the network associated w one address family is deemed >>>> non-critical). >>>> | > >>>> | > >>>> | >HG> as it is unlikely t

Re: LFA manageability : per AF config => feedback required

led-MPLS. At THAT point in time it becomes >>> >>important >>> >> | to protect the IPv6 controlled MPLS traffic, and thus the IPv6 >>> >> | address family in the IGP, but no earlier. >>> >> | >>> >> | So please do not mix up control traffic and customer traffic, >>> >

IETF92 RTGWG agenda

Hi RTGWG, Agenda for RTGWG meeting at IETF92 has been posted, found at http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/92/agenda/agenda-92-rtgwg See you in Dallas! Cheers, Jeff & Chris ___ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Re: IETF92 RTGWG agenda

Hi RTGWG, Agenda got updated, all YANG sessions have been timed to 8 minutes to allow additional YANG related slots. Thanks! Cheers, Jeff -Original Message- From: Jeff Tantsura Date: Monday, March 9, 2015 at 5:16 PM To: "rtgwg@ietf.org" Subject: IETF92 RTGWG agenda

Re: IETF92 RTGWG agenda

Hi RTGWG, Updated agenda has been posted, in order to accommodate all the slots requested we cut down all the sessions to 8 minutes. When preparing slides please take into account the time limit and rather busy agenda. Thanks! Cheers, Jeff & Chris >--Original Message- >

Re: IETF92 RTGWG agenda - please note the 2nd slot

slides in time! Thanks! Cheers, Jeff & Chris -Original Message- From: Jeff Tantsura Date: Sunday, March 15, 2015 at 2:25 PM To: "rtgwg@ietf.org" Subject: Re: IETF92 RTGWG agenda >Hi RTGWG, > > >Updated agenda has been posted, in order to accommodate all the sl

Please note - we are going to have 2 sessions - 1st today 17:30-18:30, 2nd - Thursday 13:00-15:00 (as planned originally)

Cheers, Jeff ___ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

RTGWG minutes available

RTGWG, Please see the URL for the RTGWG minutes. Thanks to Acee Lindem and Ignas Bagdonas for taking them. https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/92/minutes/minutes-92-rtgwg See you all in Prague. Cheers, Jeff ___ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https:/

Request for WG adoption of draft-litkowski-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement and draft-decraene-rtgwg-backoff-algo

Hi RTGWG, The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt: draft-litkowski-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement and draft-decraene-rtgwg-backoff-algo as working group documents. There was support during the last IETF meeting (92) in Dallas. Please indicate support or no-support by May 1st, 2015. If you a

Re: Request for WG adoption of draft-litkowski-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement and draft-decraene-rtgwg-backoff-algo

: Jeff Tantsura Date: Thursday, April 16, 2015 at 10:24 AM To: "rtgwg@ietf.org" Subject: Request for WG adoption of draft-litkowski-rtgwg-spf-uloop-pb-statement and draft-decraene-rtgwg-backoff-algo >Hi RTGWG, > >The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt: >draft-litkow

Re: Mail regarding draft-decraene-rtgwg-backoff-algo

Mike, Thank you for the very valuable comments and great review! Acee – looking forward to the new revision which would also incorporate Mike’s comments. Cheers, Jeff From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" mailto:a...@cisco.com>> Date: Thursday, May 7, 2015 at 6:30 AM To: Mike Shand mailto:imc.sh...@gmail.

FW: IETF hackathon

Dear RTGWG, Happy to share - in Prague we will have a hackathon event: http://www.ietf.org/blog/2015/05/ietf-hackathon/ Cheers, Jeff -Original Message- From: Jari Arkko Date: Sunday, May 17, 2015 at 2:17 AM To: IETF WG Chairs Subject: IETF hackathon >Chairs, > >I wanted to highligh

Request for WG adoption of draft-rtg-dt-encap-02

Hi RTGWG, The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt draft-rtg-dt-encap-02 as working group document. Please indicate support or no-support by June 8, 2015. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relev

Re: [bess] Fwd: Third and FINAL call for volunteers, Nomcom 2015-2016

Hi RTGWG, Please consider volunteering for NomCom. Thanks! Cheers, Jeff > Message transféré >Sujet : Third and FINAL call for volunteers, Nomcom 2015-2016 >Date : Mon, 15 Jun 2015 02:59:28 -0700 >De : NomCom Chair 2015 >Répondre à : i...@ietf.org >Pour : IETF Announcement Lis

request for RTGWG slot at IETF 93 in Prague

Dear RTGWG, If you would like an agenda slot for the upcoming RTGWG meetings at IETF 93 in Prague, please send the chairs a request. Thanks! Jeff & Chris ___ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Re: Request for WG adoption of draft-rtg-dt-encap-02

Hi This poll has ended and there has been sufficient support to adopt the draft as the working group document. Authors, please republish as draft-ietf-rtgwg-dt-encap-00 Thanks! Jeff and Chris -Original Message- From: Jeff Tantsura Date: Friday, May 22, 2015 at 2:58 PM To: "

Re: [sfc] NSH and UDP Transport

Hi Larry, Noted, 10 minutes slot has been reserved for you. Regards, Jeff > On Jun 29, 2015, at 7:05 PM, Larry Kreeger (kreeger) > wrote: > > Following up on this, we would like to have a slot in Prague (somewhere) > to present this draft. > > Jeff, > > Can we get on the agenda in RTGWG for

Preliminary agenda for RTGWG meetings at IETF93

Dear RTGWG, Preliminary agenda for RTGWG meetings at IETF93 has been posted, found at https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/93/agenda/agenda-93-rtgwg We will updated it as new requests are being received, please check it for the correctness. Thanks and see you in Prague! Cheers, Jeff & Chris _

RTGWG slides for IETF 93

Presenters, Please make sure to send the slides in time, for those presenting Monday slides by Sunday would really be appreciated. Thanks! Cheers, Jeff ___ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Request for WG adoption of draft-liu-rtgwg-yang-rip

Hi RTGWG, The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt draft-liu-rtgwg-yang-rip Please indicate support or no-support by August 1st, 2015. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The respons

RTGWG adoption call for draft-liu-rtgwg-yang-rip-01

Hi RTGWG, The RTGWG adoption call for draft-liu-rtgwg-yang-rip-01 has been completed, and this document has been adopted as a WG draft. The authors should submit this as draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-00.txt. Cheers, Jeff & Chris ___ rtgwg mailing li

RTGWG adoption call for draft-shaikh-rtgwg-policy-model

Hi RTGWG, The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt draft-shaikh-rtgwg-policy-model Please indicate support or no-support by August 18, 2015. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The r

RTGWG LC for draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc

Hi RTGWG, This email is to start 2 weeks RTGWG LC for draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc-05 Authors have addressed all the comments. Please indicate support or no-support as well as your comments by August 18, 2015. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this

Re: New Version Notification for draft-francois-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-00.txt

Thanks Pierre. I assume you'd want to present it during next IETF? Regards, Jeff > On Aug 17, 2015, at 4:41 PM, Pierre Francois (pifranco) > wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > Here comes the re-submission of the ti-lfa draft to rtgwg, as discussed > during last IETF. > > Regards, > > Pierr

IETF93 RTGWG minutes

Hi RTGWG, Minutes are at: https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/93/minutes/minutes-93-rtgwg Please provide your comments/suggestions. Thanks! Jeff & Chris ___ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Re: RTGWG adoption call for draft-shaikh-rtgwg-policy-model

Hi RTGWG, The RTGWG adoption call for draft-shaikh-rtgwg-policy-model has been completed, and this document is ready to be adopted as a WG draft. We are still awaiting IPR responses from the authors. Cheers, Jeff & Chris -Original Message- From: Jeff Tantsura Date: Sunday, Augu

Re: Poll for WG adoption of draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-01

chair hat off Support, very useful work Cheers, Jeff From: Chris Bowers mailto:cbow...@juniper.net>> Date: Monday, August 24, 2015 at 9:32 PM To: "rtgwg@ietf.org" mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>> Cc: rtgwg-chairs mailto:rtgwg-cha...@ietf.org>>, "draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-rout

Re: RTGWG adoption call for draft-shaikh-rtgwg-policy-model

Dear authors, Thanks for finalizing the IPR part of the adoption call. Please republish draft-shaikh-rtgwg-policy-model as draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-00. Thanks! Jeff & Chris ___ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listin

Re: New Version Notification for draft-acee-rtg-yang-key-chain-08.txt

Hi Acee, I¹ll start the working group adoption as well as QA review. Have a great weekend! Cheers, Jeff -Original Message- From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" Date: Friday, September 25, 2015 at 9:34 AM To: Routing WG Subject: FW: New Version Notification for draft-acee-rtg-yang-key-chain-0

Request for RTGWG slot at IETF 94 in Yokohama

Dear RTGWG, If you would like an agenda slot for the upcoming RTGWG meetings at IETF 94 in Yokohama, please send the chairs a request. Thanks! Jeff & Chris ___ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

wg adoption of draft-litkowski-rtgwg-uloop-delay

Hi RTGWG, Some time ago authors of draft-litkowski-rtgwg-uloop-delay have asked for the WG to adopt this draft, adoption call had been done, wg supported the adoption, after clarifying the IPR we are finally ready to proceed. May you have anything against the adoption - please indicate your posi

IETF94 RTGWG agenda has bee published

Dear RTGWG, The agenda has been published at https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/agenda/agenda-94-rtgwg Please check whether anything is missing and let the chairs know ASAP. Please note – we still have got 20 min available Monday. Cheers, Jeff and Chris

Re: IETF94 RTGWG agenda has been published

Thursday: Greg will present the following draft: 7) 16:50-17:00 - draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd Greg Mirsky 10 minutes Please check the agenda. Thanks! Cheers, Jeff and Chris From: Jeff Tantsura mailto:jeff.tants...@ericsson.com>> Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 03:50 To: RTGWG Working

Call for note-taker, jabber scribe for rtgwg meetings Monday and Thursday

Dear all, Would really appreciate your help! Regards, Jeff and Chris ___ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

FW: [mpls] Fwd: NomCom 2015 - Second Request for feedback

Hi RTGWG, Please do provide your feedback to NomCom. Thanks! Cheers, Jeff > > Forwarded Message >Subject: NomCom 2015 - Second Request for feedback >Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 20:08:18 -0700 >From: NomCom Chair 2015 >Reply-To: i...@ietf.org >To: IETF Announcement List >CC: i.

Re: Request for WG adoption of draft-bashandy-rtgwg-bgp-pic-02.txt

each individual that has contributed to the document. Cheers, Jeff & Chris From: "Ahmed Bashandy (bashandy)" mailto:basha...@cisco.com>> Date: Monday, November 9, 2015 at 16:25 To: Jeff Tantsura mailto:jeff.tants...@ericsson.com>>, Chris Bowers mailto:cbow...@juniper

RTGWG adoption call for draft-acee-rtg-yang-key-chain

Dear RTGWG, The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt draft-acee-rtg-yang-key-chain as the working group document. Please indicate support or no-support by November 16, 2015. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email stating of whether or not you are

Re: WGLC for draft-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture *and* draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm

Hi Alvaro, I support publication of both drafts as a co-author. I am not aware of IPR , other than that already disclosed. Cheers, Jeff From: Alvaro Retana mailto:aret...@cisco.com>> Date: Thursday, November 12, 2015 at 08:27 To: "rtgwg@ietf.org" mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>>

IETF94 RTGWG minutes

Hi RTGWG, Notes have been published at https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/minutes/minutes-94-rtgwg Thanks Acee and Ignas! Please review and comment. Cheers, Jeff ___ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Re: IETF94 RTGWG minutes

Hi Bruno, Thank you very much for your comments. Updated. Cheers, Jeff From: "bruno.decra...@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>" mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>> Date: Monday, November 23, 2015 at 00:58 To: Jeff Tantsura mailto:jeff.tants...@ericss

Re: IETF94 RTGWG minutes

Hi RTGWG, Updated (minor) notes have been published at https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/minutes/minutes-94-rtgwg Thanks Acee and Ignas! Please review and comment. Cheers, Jeff From: Jeff Tantsura mailto:jeff.tants...@ericsson.com>> Date: Friday, November 20, 2015 at 10:46 To:

Re: RTGWG adoption call for draft-acee-rtg-yang-key-chain

Dear RTGWG, The poll has ended and there has been sufficient support to adopt the draft as the working group document. Authors, please republish as draft-ietf-rtgwg-rtg-yang-key-chain-00 Cheers, Jeff and Chris From: Jeff Tantsura mailto:jeff.tants...@ericsson.com>> Date: Tuesday, Novem

Re: Request for WG adoption of draft-bashandy-rtgwg-bgp-pic-02.txt

Dear RTGWG, The poll has ended and there has been sufficient support to adopt the draft as the working group document. Authors, please republish as draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-pic-00 Cheers, Jeff and Chris From: rtgwg mailto:rtgwg-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of Jeff Tantsura mailto:jeff

Re: RTGWG adoption call for draft-acee-rtg-yang-key-chain

Hi Acee, Yes, makes sense. Please do so. Thanks! Cheers, Jeff From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" mailto:a...@cisco.com>> Date: Tuesday, December 1, 2015 at 09:52 To: Jeff Tantsura mailto:jeff.tants...@ericsson.com>>, "rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>" ma

Re: Request for WG adoption of draft-bashandy-rtgwg-bgp-pic-02.txt

Please disregard previous email. Thanks! Cheers, Jeff From: "Ahmed Bashandy (bashandy)" mailto:basha...@cisco.com>> Date: Monday, December 7, 2015 at 20:20 To: Jeff Tantsura mailto:jeff.tants...@ericsson.com>>, Chris Bowers mailto:cbow...@juniper.net>> Cc: Pr

Re: Design Team on Overlay OAM in Routing is Chartered

Great news! Full support and looking forward to working with the DT team! Regards, Jeff On Dec 16, 2015, at 11:33 PM, Alia Atlas mailto:akat...@gmail.com>> wrote: Based on the presentation by Greg Mirsky and discussion in rtgwg and elsewhere, I have decided to charter a fast-moving Routing Are

poll on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-ip-mib-08

Dear RTGWG, We are considering further progress of draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-ip-mib-08 and would like to poll the wg to see whether there’s enough interest to proceed with this work, i.e. WGLC. Please respond, especially if you feel this work has to continue, also - please let us know if there are

Re: I-D Action: draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-03.txt

Hi RTGWG, Given the importance of the document, please do review and provide your comments, suggestions and in case you wouldn't support it as is - what should be changed/missing. Thanks! Regards, Jeff > On Feb 23, 2016, at 6:40 PM, Lou Berger wrote: > > > Hello, >This draft has been

progress of draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay

Hi RTGWG, Chris and I wanted to get a sense of how the working group would like to proceed regarding draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay For sake of simplicity – anyplace further in the email - any changes to proposed to the existing IGP timers behavior by uloop–delay draft will be called - "uloop–d

RTGWG presentation slot requests for Buenos Aires

Dear RTGWG It's that time again! The preliminary agenda for IETF 95 has been published; you can find it at https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/95/agenda.html. RTGWG will be meeting from 10:00 - 12:30 on Thursday April 7th in Buen Ayre C and 10:00 - 12:00 on Friday April 8th in Atlantico C. I

change of affiliation

Dear RTGWG, I have decided to leave Ericsson and would like to notify you about the change. I’ll update you with my new affiliation after I have decided what it is going to be. Thanks, Jeff ___ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/m

WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection

Dear RTGWG, The authors of draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection have told us that the draft is ready for working group last call (WGLC). Before we do the WGLC we want to do an IPR poll on the document. This mail starts that IPR poll. Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-rtgw

Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection

Thanks Pushpasis, including RTGWG. From: Pushpasis Sarkar Date: Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 1:59 AM To: Jeff Tantsura , Subject: Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection Hi Jeff, Many many thanks for starting the WGLC call. FYI, I am not aware of any IPR other than

  1   2   3   4   >