Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming-08: (with COMMENT)

Thank you Jen -éric On 01/07/2019, 17:09, "iesg on behalf of Jen Linkova" wrote: It's the only modern version of IP we have...The default one...;))) Anyway, added ;) ___ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailma

Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-30: (with COMMENT)

Yingzhen Thank you for your reply: we are all set Regards -éric -Original Message- From: Yingzhen Qu Date: Thursday, 12 August 2021 at 06:46 To: Eric Vyncke Cc: The IESG , "draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-mo...@ietf.org" , rtgwg-chairs , routing WG , Chris Bowers , "aretana.i...@gmail.com

Re: [savnet] IPv6 and/or IPv4//RE: SAVNET WG charter

On my side, IPv6 support is an obvious MUST and IPv4 is really a SHOULD, i.e., like written below if IPv4 is not supported by SAVNET WG, then there must really be a good reason. I would expect that all documents are dual-stack though -éric From: savnet on behalf of Lizhenbin Date: Tuesday,

draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing in RTGWG for src-dest routing

Dear V6OPS, [Without any hat except my IPv6 interest] In the line of renewed interest in multi-homed multi-prefixed networks, I just discovered a refreshed IETF draft in RTGWG: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-dst-src-routing-07 with a new set of authors in addition to Anto

Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-19: (with COMMENT)

Thank you Acee On 24/05/2023, 22:48, "Acee Lindem" mailto:acee.i...@gmail.com>> wrote: HI Éric, Thanks for the review. > On May 24, 2023, at 1:05 PM, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker > wrote: > > Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-

Re: New Version Notification for draft-mendes-rtgwg-rosa-use-cases-00.txt

Hello Dirk, Obviously writing this email without any hat, I did not find any reference to the CATS WG [1] in the ROSA draft. While CATS has already a good direction on what to do, it seems to me that ROSA and CATS are addressing very similar problems. Do you intend to work within the CATS WG ?

Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc5798bis-17: (with COMMENT)

Acee, Thank you for your reply and thank you in advance for the -17. Regards -éric On 04/01/2024, 16:39, "Acee Lindem" mailto:acee.i...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Eric, > On Jan 4, 2024, at 09:53, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker > wrote: > > Éric Vyncke has entered the f

Re: WG Adoption Call - draft-llsyang-rtgwg-dst-src-routing (05/20/24 - 06/02/24)

As an individual contributor, I also support the WG adoption of this I-D. It is really important for IPv6 multi-homing without using eBGP and PI space. Note that the BCP14 template is outdated and should be fixed. s/Conventionally, NAT or policy routing would be used/In the legacy IPv4 work, N

Re: Anonymous routing with encrypted IP addresses (Initial Internet Draft)

Pedro, Thanks for your email and BTW the usual format is a submitted IETF draft as pointed to by Alvaro (see https://authors.ietf.org). I quickly browsed through your text and the big question is of course the scalability of your proposal: an Internet router cannot really flood unknown destina