On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 02:39:58PM -0700, Yingzhen Qu wrote:
> There is currently no IPR disclosure of this draft.
> Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any
> IPR that applies to the draft.
I am unaware of any IPR applying to this draft.
> Please review the doc
Hi Fan, Yongqing, Bo, Jiayuan,
for the ipv6-address-resolution-yang draft, could you elaborate if/how
the SEND bits were tested?
With SEND deployments being somewhat uncommon, I'm a bit concerned we
don't have a lot of people who could easily spot problems with the
model. Even just "dry"/"demo"
Hi all,
as noted on mic a few minutes ago, I do not think this draft is a good
idea. The two specific points I made on mic are these:
- LLDP is intentionally designed to bypass STP; you want to know what is
on the other end of the link even if the port is blocked. Can you
discard the route
