Hi all,
FYI, the draft has been updated to address the suggestions from Acee.
Thanks,
Fan
*From:* internet-dra...@ietf.org
*Date:* 2025-02-19 17:34
*To:* Bo Wu ; Fan Zhang
; Jiayuan
Hu ; Yongqing Zhu
*Subject:* New Version Notification for
draft-zhang-rtgwg-ipv6-address-resolution-yang-02.txt
A
All,
I think this Errata should be accepted as the pseudo code should be consistent
with the text and require the first IPv6 address to be a link-local address.
Thanks,
Acee
> On Feb 17, 2025, at 10:47, RFC Errata System
> wrote:
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC95
All,
I think this Errata should be accepted as a zero interval is invalid and this
should be called out explicitly.
Thanks,
Acee
> On Feb 17, 2025, at 11:09, RFC Errata System
> wrote:
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9568,
> "Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VR
Hi Quentin, et al,
I think this Errata should be rejected. Trying to handled a misconfiguration
rather than logging it as an error is not an errata change but something that
could be proposed in a draft (along with any other such proposed changes).
Thanks,
Acee
> On Feb 17, 2025, at 10:25, Q
All,
I believe this Errata should be accepted as a IPvX Addr Count of zero is an
error.
Thanks,
Acee
> On Feb 17, 2025, at 10:36, RFC Errata System
> wrote:
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9568,
> "Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) Version 3 for IPv4 and IP
