[rtgwg] Re: Document Shepherd Review for draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-p2mp-bfd

2025-02-13 Thread xiao.min2
Hi Greg, Thank you for the prompt reply. I believe your proposed text changes have addressed all my comments. p.s. It seems the first OLD TEXT should be "Figure 1 displays the extension of VRRP [RFC9568] to bootstrap a tail of the p2mp BFD session." And there is one typo in the second NEW TEXT,

[rtgwg] Re: Document Shepherd Review for draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-p2mp-bfd

2025-02-13 Thread Greg Mirsky
Hi Xiao Min, thank you for your constructive comments and help in improving the document. I'll upload the new version shortly. Regards, Greg On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 5:40 PM wrote: > Hi Greg, > > > Thank you for the prompt reply. > > I believe your proposed text changes have addressed all my com

[rtgwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-p2mp-bfd-12.txt

2025-02-13 Thread internet-drafts
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-p2mp-bfd-12.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group (RTGWG) WG of the IETF. Title: Applicability of Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for Multi-point Networks in Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) Authors

[rtgwg] Re: WG adoption call for draft-zhang-rtgwg-ipv6-address-resolution-yang (02/10/25-02/25/25)

2025-02-13 Thread Chongfeng Xie
Hi all, IPv6 address resolution is a basic function of IP network and is essential for whole network operation, this draft provides a typical means of configuring this function to network controller, I think it is useful, so I support its adoption. Best regards Chongfeng From: Yingzhen Qu

[rtgwg] Re: Document Shepherd Review for draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-p2mp-bfd

2025-02-13 Thread Greg Mirsky
Hi Xiao Min, thank you for your helpful suggestion to clarify the use of the extension of the VRRP Advertisement packet defined in the draft. Please check proposed updates, I hope these address your concern (I attached the diff highlighting all updates): OLD TEXT: Figure 1 displays the extens