[rtgwg] Re: Document Shepherd Review for draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-p2mp-bfd

2025-02-12 Thread xiao.min2
Hi Greg, Thank you for addressing my comments. Please see my responses inline. Original From: GregMirsky To: 肖敏10093570; Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-p2mp-...@ietf.org ;rtgwg@ietf.org ; Date: 2025年02月11日 13:16 Subject: Re: Document Shepherd Review for draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-p2mp-bfd Hi Xi

[rtgwg] Re: Document Shepherd Review for draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-p2mp-bfd

2025-02-12 Thread xiao.min2
Hi Greg, Thank you for the note on the last open item. Please see inline. Original From: GregMirsky To: 肖敏10093570; Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-p2mp-...@ietf.org ;rtgwg@ietf.org ; Date: 2025年02月13日 05:49 Subject: Re: Document Shepherd Review for draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-p2mp-bfd Hi Xiao Min,t

[rtgwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-21.txt

2025-02-12 Thread internet-drafts
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-21.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group (RTGWG) WG of the IETF. Title: Topology Independent Fast Reroute using Segment Routing Authors: Ahmed Bashandy Stephane Litkowski Clar

[rtgwg] Re: Document Shepherd Review for draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-p2mp-bfd

2025-02-12 Thread Greg Mirsky
Hi Xiao Min, thank you for your expedient response. I am glad that we are rapidly converging. One more note below tagged GIM2>>. Regards, Greg On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 2:02 AM wrote: > Hi Greg, > > > Thank you for addressing my comments. > > Please see my responses inline. > Original > *From: *G

[rtgwg] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-20.txt

2025-02-12 Thread Ahmed Bashandy
Thanks a lot for the comments I adopted all the suggestions in version 21 at https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-21.txt Please take a look at it in case I missed something Ahmed On 2/6/25 1:29 PM, John Scudder wrote: Hi All, Thanks for all your work on

[rtgwg] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-20.txt

2025-02-12 Thread Stewart Bryant
I have looked at the latest version and I think that from a technical perspective we can safely publish version 21 I do have two comments Firstly I am surprised at the prominence (it is the first reference in the draft) given to [I-D.bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-uloop] given that it is in i