The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9568,
"Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) Version 3 for IPv4 and IPv6".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7947
--
Type
I support working group adoption. This is currently supported in Free Range
Routing (FRR) for IPv6 static routes. See
https://docs.frrouting.org/en/latest/static.html
Thanks,
Acee
> On May 20, 2024, at 17:39, Yingzhen Qu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This email begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9568,
"Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) Version 3 for IPv4 and IPv6".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7949
--
Type
I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this Draft either. Sorry for the
delay.
thanks
Venkit
On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 1:10 AM Yingzhen Qu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Not all authors have responded to the IPR poll in the adoption call
> thread, so I'd like to ask all the authors and contributors to
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
Thanks,
R.Ashok
From: Yingzhen Qu
Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2024 1:10 AM
To: RTGWG ; rtgwg-chairs ; n...@ietf.org
; draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sd...@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] IPR call for draft-dmk
Thank you for the detailed review
I uploaded version 14 of the draft.
See #Ahmed for response to the comments
Ahmed
On 4/17/24 5:04 AM, Gunter Van de Velde via Datatracker wrote:
Gunter Van de Velde has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-13: Di
> From: NomCom Chair 2024
> Date: May 8, 2024 at 13:13:26 PDT
> To: IETF Announcement List
> Cc: i...@ietf.org
> Subject: Call for volunteers
> Reply-To: nomcom-chair-2...@ietf.org
>
> The IETF Nominating Committee (NomCom) appoints people to fill the open
> slots on the IETF LLC, IETF Trust
A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Jeff Tantsura, a
Chair of the RTGWG Working Group.
-
Working Group Name: Routing Area Working Group
Area Name: Routing Area
Session Requester: Jeff Tantsura
Number of Sessions: 1
L
As an individual contributor, I also support the WG adoption of this I-D.
It is really important for IPv6 multi-homing without using eBGP and PI space.
Note that the BCP14 template is outdated and should be fixed.
s/Conventionally, NAT or policy routing would be used/In the legacy IPv4 work,
N
