Hi WG,
We have just posted a new draft about sbfd path consistency over SRv6 in BFDWG.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6-00
This document describes a method to keep the forward path and
reverse path of S-BFD consistent when detecting SRv6 Policy.
Any
the
forward path from SRH
2.Get segment list of reverse path by the path segment as a reverse path
segment from mapping table
3. Encapsulating response packet with the reverse segment list
Any comments and suggestions are greatly welcome.
Best regards,
Changwang Lin
发件人: linchangwang
Hi WG & Chairs
We updated the draft: draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6-02.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6/
This draft describes the method of keep the path consistency of sbfd in
detecting SRv6 policy through Path Segment,
and this d
BFD performance.
Thanks,
Changwang lin
From: Reshad Rahman [mailto:res...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2022 10:37 PM
To: jh...@pfrc.org; rtg-bfd@ietf.org; spr...@ietf.org; linchangwang (RD)
Cc: jiangweny...@chinamobile.com
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6
Hi Greg,
The differences between the SRH of user data and bfd packet:
1. The encapsulations of user data usually include a Service-SID in the
SRH, but the encapsulations of BFD does not.
2. In order to make sure the BFD control packet can reach the tail-end,
IPv6 address of the ta
Hi all，
I've read the document and believe it is ready for publication.
We have lots of deployments using BFD Echo，such as local protection for faster
failure dection.
It would be greatly appreciated if this draft could be standardized ASAP!
Best Regards，
Changwang lin
Original
From: Jeffre
