Hello Chairs,
I am unaware of any IPR other than the one already disclosed.
Thanks
Prasad
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Haas
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 03:44
To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bfd-vx...@ietf.org
Subject: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan, ending November 9
Workin
Hello Greg/ Nobo,
Thanks for this thoughtful discussion, I would like to clarify the motivation
of this draft:
1. There are scenarios where fault detection be initiated and managed
from one end since the logic to failover (to a backup PW) is present on only on
that end. The other end ma
Message-
From: Pals [mailto:pals-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Vengada Prasad Govindan
(venggovi)
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 10:23 PM
To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org; p...@ietf.org
Cc: Jeffrey Haas (jh...@pfrc.org); Carlos Pignataro
(cpignata); agma...@gmail.com; nobo.akiya@gmail.com; Stewart
.
Thanks
Prasad
-Original Message-
From: Jiangyuanlong [mailto:jiangyuanl...@huawei.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 11:50 PM
To: Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi); rtg-bfd@ietf.org; p...@ietf.org
Cc: Jeffrey Haas (jh...@pfrc.org); Carlos Pignataro
(cpignata); agma...@gmail.com
I support the WGLC of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-base.
Thanks
Prasad
-Original Message-
From: Rtg-bfd [mailto:rtg-bfd-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Haas
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 1:51 AM
To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Subject: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-base
Working Group,
This is to
I support the WGLC of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-ip
-Original Message-
From: Rtg-bfd [mailto:rtg-bfd-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Haas
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 1:54 AM
To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Subject: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-ip
Working Group,
This begins a two week Workin
I am not aware of any IPR related to this document.
Thanks
Prasad
-Original Message-
From: Rtg-bfd [mailto:rtg-bfd-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Haas
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 1:28 AM
To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Cc: m...@ietf.org
Subject: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-bfd-rfc5
Hello Santosh/ Authors,
Thanks for sharing the document, please find a few thoughts below.
1. The current document talks about both BFD and S-BFD - would it be beneficial
to make separate documents for BFD and SBFD to maintain consistency with the
current set of documents.
2. Motivation: It would
, May 06, 2015 11:08 AM
To: Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi); rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Subject: RE: New Version Notification for draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan-00.txt
Hello Prasad,
Thanks a lot for your review comments.
> 1. The current document talks about both BFD and S-BFD - would it be
> bene
-
From: Santosh P K [mailto:santos...@juniper.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 3:03 PM
To: MALLIK MUDIGONDA (mmudigon)
Cc: Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi); rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Subject: RE: New Version Notification for draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan-00.txt
Mallik,
Thanks for your review comments
Hello Santosh,
Thanks for your careful review. You bring up a valid point, that needs
clarification. Even without multiple BFD sessions on the if the
egress were to inform about a BFD session going to DOWN (potentially using the
diag code 0x4 - Neighbor Signalled Down), the YourDisc field nee
ari; Gregory Mirsky; Vengada Prasad Govindan
(venggovi)
Cc: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan-00.txt
Hi Shahram,
Agree that running a separate session for each VNI is not going to be scalable.
But the current draft only allows implementations
Mirsky
Cc: Shahram Davari; Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi); MALLIK MUDIGONDA
(mmudigon); Santosh P K; rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan-00.txt
Greg
Could you please provide an example of VNI to VNI failure or degradation that
can'
Hello Shahram,
Please find a few replies inlined with GVP1>. Am glad to discuss this further.
Thanks
Prasad
-Original Message-
From: S. Davari [mailto:realestate.dav...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2015 6:46 PM
To: Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)
Cc: Gregory Mirsky; Shah
]
Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2015 8:24 PM
To: Shahram Davari
Cc: Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi); Gregory Mirsky; MALLIK MUDIGONDA
(mmudigon); Santosh P K; rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan-00.txt
Hi
May be a better way to make this clear is to
Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-gp-pals-seamless-vccv-01
Thanks
Prasad
-Original Message-
From: Rtg-bfd [mailto:rtg-bfd-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Vengada Prasad
Govindan (venggovi)
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 5:19 PM
To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org; p...@ietf.org
To: Shahram Davari; Gregory Mirsky; Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)
Cc: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Subject: RE: New Version Notification for draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan-00.txt
> Another question I have is how do you forward these BFD packets from
> VTEP to VM? Since DIP = 127/8, I assume there
Hello Jeff,
I have re-submitted the document after addressing comments from Santosh, who
has also acknowledged support for WGLC. I believe all authors should have
submitted IPR disclosures as well (please let me know if anything is missing).
Can you please progress the document to the next sta
Hello Nobo,
While I do agree that there could be value in getting a self-destined packet
encapsulated in VxLAN as you describe below, the datapath flow of VxLAN decap
followed by a L2 lookup and a VxLAN (re)encap is not supported on most silicon
(Shahram, please correct me if I am wrong here)
Hello all,
The updated document has been submitted to the IETF repository. Please find
the email attachment about the latest version.
Thanks
Prasad
-Original Message-
From: Alvaro Retana (aretana)
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 10:15 PM
To: Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)
Cc
Hello Scott/ all,
Thanks for your comment, do you think the proposed text below makes better
sense (additions highlighted in green):
The BFD session MAY be removed in the egress LSR if the BFD
session transitions from UP to DOWN. This can either be done
immediately after t
, Scott [mailto:s...@harvard.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 3:00 PM
To: Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)
Cc: ops-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bfd-rfc5884-clarifications@ietf.org;
rtg-bfd@ietf.org; Jeffrey Haas (jh...@pfrc.org)
Subject: Re: ops-dir review of draft-ietf-bfd-rfc5884
Hello Kathleen,
Thanks for your comment, this will be addressed in the next revision.
Prasad
-Original Message-
From: Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 7:54 AM
To: The IESG
Cc: Jeffrey Haas ;
draft-ietf-bfd-rfc5884-clarificati
Hello all,
The authors request comments on the draft below.
Thanks
Prasad
-Original Message-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2016 11:33 AM
To: MALLIK MUDIGONDA (mmudigon) ; Basil Saji
; Greg Mirsky ; Vengada Prasad
Govindan
[mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2016 6:11 PM
To: MALLIK MUDIGONDA (mmudigon) ; MALLIK MUDIGONDA
(mmudigon) ; Greg Mirsky ;
Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi) ; Gregory Mirsky
; Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd-00.txt
A new
Have read the draft and think it is useful in addressing a valid use case.
Hence I support its adoption.
Thanks
Prasad
From: Rtg-bfd [mailto:rtg-bfd-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Chris Bowers
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 9:14 PM
To: rt...@ietf.org; rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Subject: WG adoption pol
Hello Sasha/ WG,
Apologies for the delayed response, Thank you for your detailed comments.
Thanks to Donald Eastlake and Ali Sajassi for their kind offline discussions.
We have submitted -10 version to the datatracker to address them. In addition,
please see our responses below iniline with GVP+
27 matches
Mail list logo
