[resend, wrong bfd wg address in first attempt ...]
Authors, WG,
thank you for this document. It is clear and well written.
I didn't find any technical comment to make so I've been nit picking :-)
Please find those comments below.
regards,
martin
---
Please check and address the nits:
https://t
>>.
Regards,
Greg
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 8:06 AM, Martin Vigoureux
mailto:martin.vigour...@nokia.com>> wrote:
[resend, wrong bfd wg address in first attempt ...]
Authors, WG,
thank you for this document. It is clear and well written.
I didn't find any technical c
ached please find the diff between -14 and the working version of the
draft. Please let me know if the changes address your comments. Will
upload the new version promptly.
Regards,
Greg
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Martin Vigoureux
mailto:martin.vigour...@nokia.com>> wrote:
Greg,
p and support.
Regards,
Greg
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 12:31 PM, Martin Vigoureux
wrote:
Greg,
I'm fine your proposal below.
Please post the final update whenever you can.
Thx
-m
Le 2018-04-17 à 20:40, Greg Mirsky a écrit :
Hi Martin,
I have not ignored that comment but missed to ack its accep
Greg,
looking back in the doc I found:
Poll (P)
Set to 1 if the local system is sending a Poll Sequence or is a
session of type MultipointHead soliciting the identities of the
tails, or 0 if not.
This looks to me as not being in line with the rest of the documen
WG, Authors,
hello.
thank you for this Document. I have done my AD review.
I find the document much harder to apprehend than mpBFD. I have a number
of comments but may have another round of them based on your replies.
-m
---
General:
I find the use of reliable (and of its variants) not appr
.
Regards,
Greg
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 5:35 AM, Martin Vigoureux
mailto:martin.vigour...@nokia.com>> wrote:
Greg,
looking back in the doc I found:
Poll (P)
Set to 1 if the local system is sending a Poll Sequence or
is a
session of type Multipoi
ssion.
Please find my answers, notes in-line tagged GIM>>.
Attached are the new working version of the draft and the diff to -07.
I'll update the references and share an update after that's done.
Regards,
Greg
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Martin Vigoureux
mailto:martin.vigour
Hello Mirja,
thanks for your review. Please see few reactions in-line. I'm not
speaking for the authors so I'll let them chime in and agree/disagree.
-m
Le 2018-07-03 à 20:31, Mirja Kühlewind a écrit :
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-18
:
On Jul 3, 2018, at 2:43 PM, Martin Vigoureux wrote:
Ben
so, I'm not sure to have fully understood your initial statement and I might
have introduced additional confusion with mine.
bfd-multipoint-active-tail extends the capabilities of bfd-multipoint and in
doing so modifies that
Hello Alissa,
thanks for your review.
I'm fine with discussing this but wonder if we should tie it to this draft.
I would prefer that we collectively discuss that and once we reach a
decision we start applying it.
Thanks
-m
Le 2018-07-03 à 23:18, Alissa Cooper a écrit :
Alissa Cooper has ent
Hello Mirja,
time has passed since the last exchanges on that. To reinitiate the
discussion, I come back to your original points.
Le 2018-07-03 à 20:31, Mirja Kühlewind a écrit :
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-18: Discuss
When respond
sorry, auto-completion issue with BFD WG alias.
please see my original request below.
Message transféré
Sujet : Quick review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover-15
Date : Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:52:34 +0100
De : Martin Vigoureux
Pour : i...@ietf.org , b...@ietf.org
Copie à
13 matches
Mail list logo
