Re: Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets-07

2024-05-12 Thread Jeff Haas
Jürgen, Thanks for the review. Both of your points are addressed in Section 3: bfd.PaddedPduSize: The BFD transport protocol payload size is increased to this value. The contents of this additional payload MUST be zero. The minimum size of this variable MUST NOT be smaller than permitted by the

Re: Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets-07

2024-05-12 Thread Jeff Haas
Jürgen, Juniper Business Use Only On 12.05.24 16:05, Jeff Haas wrote: > > bfd.PaddedPduSize: > > The BFD transport protocol payload size is increased to this value. The > > contents of this additional payload MUST be zero. The minimum size of this > > variable MUST NOT b

Re: Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets-07

2024-05-13 Thread Jeff Haas
Jürgen, On 5/13/24, 11:56, "Jürgen Schönwälder" mailto:jschoenwael...@constructor.univ>ersity> wrote: > "The padded PDU size for the encapsulated BFD control packets. > The minimum size is 24 or 26; see Section 6.8.6 of RFC 5880. > The maximum PDU size may be limited by the supported interface >

Re: New Version Notification for draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-02.txt

2016-01-20 Thread Jeff Haas
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 12:32 AM, Nitish Gupta (nitisgup) > wrote: > > The other thing I want to make sure if there is any particular configuration > requirement from a BFD YANG model perspective. I understand that you are > using the fast timer in BFD to detect next-hop IP address liveliness c