Re: Some comments to the authors of draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited

2022-03-01 Thread Jeffrey Haas
Greg, On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 09:34:19AM -0800, Greg Mirsky wrote: > it is also my impression that the concept described in the draft is > different from the Passive role as defined in RFC 5880. I think that needs > to be clearly explained in the draft and, it seems to be helpful to even > use ano

Re: Some comments to the authors of draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited

2022-03-01 Thread Aijun Wang
Is it better to use “reflection mode”? Aijun Wang China Telecom > 在 2022年3月1日,20:38,Jeffrey Haas 写道: > > Greg, > >> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 09:34:19AM -0800, Greg Mirsky wrote: >> it is also my impression that the concept described in the draft is >> different from the Passive role as defined

Re: Some comments to the authors of draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited

2022-03-01 Thread Greg Mirsky
Hi Jeff, thank you for the clarification. Top-posting: In the unsolicited draft: - The passive side is not sending packets. - It is waiting for an incoming session. In my understanding, that is already defined in Section 6.1 RFC 5880: A system taking the Passive role MUST NOT begin sending