Re: Working Group Last Call on BFD YANG model, RFC 9127-bis ending 20 December, 2021

2021-12-08 Thread t petch
On 07/12/2021 17:31, Jeffrey Haas wrote: Tom, On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 05:22:41PM +, t petch wrote: On 07/12/2021 13:43, Jeffrey Haas wrote: Working Group, While some explanation is required, the request to the Working Group is very simple: Please review this minor update to the recently p

Re: Working Group Last Call on BFD YANG model, RFC 9127-bis ending 20 December, 2021

2021-12-08 Thread Jeffrey Haas
Tom, On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 09:30:02AM +, t petch wrote: > All the instances of the text string '9127' that appear in the I-D > 9127-bis and most of which need to be changed to the text string > ''. I stopped counting when I got to forty. Thanks for clarifying. I've opened a new issue

Re: Working Group Last Call on BFD YANG model, RFC 9127-bis ending 20 December, 2021

2021-12-08 Thread t petch
On 08/12/2021 12:58, Jeffrey Haas wrote: Tom, On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 09:30:02AM +, t petch wrote: All the instances of the text string '9127' that appear in the I-D 9127-bis and most of which need to be changed to the text string ''. I stopped counting when I got to forty. Thanks fo

Re: Working Group Last Call on BFD YANG model, RFC 9127-bis ending 20 December, 2021

2021-12-08 Thread Reshad Rahman
On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 11:24:58 AM EST, t petch wrote: On 08/12/2021 12:58, Jeffrey Haas wrote: > Tom, > > On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 09:30:02AM +, t petch wrote: >> All the instances of the text string '9127' that appear in the I-D >> 9127-bis and most of which need to be changed

Re: Working Group Last Call on BFD YANG model, RFC 9127-bis ending 20 December, 2021

2021-12-08 Thread Jeffrey Haas
Tom, On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 04:24:27PM +, t petch wrote: > On 08/12/2021 12:58, Jeffrey Haas wrote: > >>The IANA Considerations are now a nonsense; I think that IANA need > >>consulting on what they want to do about whatever happens and > >>9127-bis revising accordingly. > > > >Issue #9 has b