Mahesh,
Sorry for long delay.
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 04:25:25PM -0700, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
> > On Jul 26, 2021, at 7:48 AM, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> > What's being requested is that our specifications have some specificity and
> > a proposal be made for a suitable mechanism and how it integ
Mike,
Thanks for bringing this to the BFD Working Group. I've had a chance to
read through the draft. In spite of it being several years since I've
worked on/with PIM, I think I've understood it. :-)
If I were to re-state the longer version of the draft's name, this is
effectively "using BFD-MP
Med,
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 12:19:23PM +, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Thank you for checking the OAM part and for sharing this comment.
>
> As you can read in both sections 4 and 5, this model is ** not a device
> configuration model **. The focus is on aspects that
Hi Jeff,
Actually, except local-multiplier that we call detection-multiplier, the same
names are used in both drafts. We can fix that one.
Please note that we are not using the interval-config-type choice given that
the single case can be covered by setting desired-min-tx-interval and
require
