Re: [Lsr] Split was Re: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110

2021-07-27 Thread tom petch
From: Reshad Rahman Sent: 21 May 2021 00:03 FYI, Mahesh did the extraction of the mpls-te from draft-ietf-bfd-yang and it's been submitted to the RFC Editor. Two months have passed and I see no change in the RFC Editor queue. Whatever was done would appear to have been not enough. I was e

Re: [Lsr] Split was Re: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110

2021-07-27 Thread Reshad Rahman
Adding John (AD). On Tuesday, July 27, 2021, 10:45:07 a.m. EDT, tom petch wrote: From: Reshad Rahman Sent: 21 May 2021 00:03 FYI, Mahesh did the extraction of the mpls-te from draft-ietf-bfd-yang and it's been submitted to the RFC Editor. Two months have passed and I see no chan

Re: [Lsr] Split was Re: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110

2021-07-27 Thread John Scudder
RFC Editor state is MISSREF, as part of cluster C336: https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C336. If I’m untangling the information there correctly, I think it’s blocked on (at least) draft-ietf-teas-yang-te. Was the surgery that Tom mentions, expected to clear it out of MISSREF? If s

Re: [Lsr] Split was Re: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110

2021-07-27 Thread John Scudder
Thanks, Mahesh. > On Jul 27, 2021, at 3:52 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani > wrote: > > The surgery that I performed on the draft, and can be seen in the attached > files both as a diff and the full file was to remove the mpls-te module > dependency from this draft. We should therefore at least not b