Hi,
My apologies for not responding earlier in this thread.
IANA originally contacted me as a Designated Expert for MAC addresses
under the IANA OUI last year in connection with version -07. At that
time, I approved an assignment for this draft. I'm fine with any
reasonable usage description the
Thank you, Donald.
Greg, would you bump the draft with this assignment?
-- Jeff
> On Aug 10, 2020, at 1:08 PM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My apologies for not responding earlier in this thread.
>
> IANA originally contacted me as a Designated Expert for MAC addresses
> under the IAN
Hi Jeff,
to update the IANA considerations section by replacing TBD1 with the actual
MAC address? I see two small allocation ranges for in the Unicast MAC
addresses:
00-52-02 to 00-52-12 Unassigned (small allocations)
.
00-52-14 to 00-52-FF Unassigned (small allocations)
Also, can we change th
Greg,
Sorry, I was looking at two messages back to back. From a unicast from Donald:
> I'm still working on catching up on the MAC address aspects of this
> discussion so this message may have been overcome by events.
>
> But individual MAC addresses are abundant. I received a request from
> IA
Hi Greg,
You shouldn't put a specific MAC address in the draft until it is
assigned in the IANA registry.
Requests that only appear in drafts don't take effect until the draft
is approved but if assignment policy for the registry does not require
IESG approval of a draft (for example, First Come
Hi Donald,
many thanks for your clarification. Will wait for the IESG review of the
current version.
Regards,
Greg
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 1:52 PM Donald Eastlake wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> You shouldn't put a specific MAC address in the draft until it is
> assigned in the IANA registry.
>
> Request
