Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authentication-10.txt

2020-07-23 Thread Jeffrey Haas
Manav, On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 08:01:01AM +0530, Manav Bhatia wrote: > GIven that there isnt a huge advantage in using Auth during INIT -> INIT > and Down -> Down we should probably stick to NULL for the sake of > simplicity. Unless, somebody finds a problem with using NULL. Part of the reason I

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authentication-10.txt

2020-07-23 Thread Manav Bhatia
Hi Jeff, I am sorry I dont understand this point. I would like to stick to NULL because it's less prone to implementation/inter-op bugs where you dont need to keep changing the kind of auth you use depending upon where you are in your finite state machine (FSM). And moreover, doing an AUTH adds n

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authentication-10.txt

2020-07-23 Thread Jeffrey Haas
Manav, On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 08:19:26PM +0530, Manav Bhatia wrote: > I am sorry I dont understand this point. > > I would like to stick to NULL because it's less prone to > implementation/inter-op bugs where you dont need to keep changing the kind > of auth you use depending upon where you are

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authentication-10.txt

2020-07-23 Thread Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
They most likely will ( I agree that it adds no additional security per our analysis. However, I expect this dialog to happen with the security ADs. Their typical answer is "if you could secure it, you should". If they don't start this conversation, we're done. :-) -- Jeff

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authentication-10.txt

2020-07-23 Thread Manav Bhatia
I would respond to that if saying "Only secure it, if you need to" :-) Cheers, Manav On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 9:23 PM Reshad Rahman (rrahman) wrote: > They most likely will ( > > I agree that it adds no additional security per our analysis. > However, I > expect this dialog to happen wit

BFD preliminary agenda for IETF108

2020-07-23 Thread Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
BFD WG, Here is the preliminary agenda for BFD @ IETF108. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-108-bfd/ Regards, Reshad & Jeff.

Meetecho for online IETF108 meeting

2020-07-23 Thread Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
Please take a look @ https://www.ietf.org/how/meetings/108/session-participant-guide/ Regards, Reshad.

BFD presentation material for IETF108

2020-07-23 Thread Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
Please send your presentation material to the chairs by Tuesday July 28th. Regards, Reshad. From: Rtg-bfd on behalf of "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" Date: Saturday, July 11, 2020 at 12:30 PM To: "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" Subject: [CORRECTION] IETF108: call for BFD presentations Final agenda

Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-bfd-stability-06.txt

2020-07-23 Thread Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
Hi Santosh, Thanks for addressing the comments. General: NULL authentication TLV is still used, should be replaced with NULL authentication type or section as appropriate. Be consistent for Null v/s NULL (NULL Auth is used in bfd-optimizing-authentication) Introduction s/detect lost packet/det