Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-13: Abstain
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.i
Éric,
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 05:28:14AM -0700, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker wrote:
> Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-13: Abstain
>
[...]
> --
> COMMENT:
>
Mahesh, thanks for addressing my comments.
I will update the shepherd write-up based on my comments below.
General: both "BFD control packet" and "BFD packet" are used. I think we should
stick to "BFD control packet".
General: s/BFD Control packet/BFD control packet/
Introduction, next-to last
Hi Mahesh and Jeff,
On 2020-07-20, 9:29 PM, "Rtg-bfd on behalf of Mahesh Jethanandani"
wrote:
Hi Jeff,
> On Jul 20, 2020, at 5:48 PM, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
>
> Mahesh,
>
> While reviewing version -10, I had the following questions:
>
> For the state machine c
GIven that there isnt a huge advantage in using Auth during INIT -> INIT
and Down -> Down we should probably stick to NULL for the sake of
simplicity. Unless, somebody finds a problem with using NULL.
Cheers, Manav
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 6:32 AM Reshad Rahman (rrahman) wrote:
> Hi Mahesh and J
