Jeff
Two of the three I-D you mention have timed out and are not available
through the usual channels.
I suggest that the first step needs to be a refresh so that they are
available.
(Yes, I know I can jump through hoops and find obsoleted I-Ds but life
is too short:-)
Tom Petch
- Original
A reminder from 5880's state machine (6.8.6)
: Else
[...]
: Else (bfd.SessionState is Up)
: If received State is Down
: Set bfd.LocalDiag to 3 (Neighbor signaled
: session down)
: Set bfd.SessionState to Down
:
Hi Tom,
We are in the process of refreshing all the drafts that have expired.
Cheers.
> On Feb 19, 2019, at 5:55 PM, tom petch wrote:
>
> Jeff
>
> Two of the three I-D you mention have timed out and are not available
> through the usual channels.
>
> I suggest that the first step needs to be
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection WG of the
IETF.
Title : Secure BFD Sequence Numbers
Authors : Mahesh Jethanandani
Sonal
Hi Jeff,
thank you for pointing to the sloppy terminology I've used referring to
what is the proposed update to RFC 5880. In fact, the draft, as I should
have done too, refers to the Diag field. Below are quotes from RFC 5880 to
help me explain the intended update:
- is section 6.1 Poll sequenc
Greg,
We seem now to be converging on the substance of your draft. Thanks for
sticking with this.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 03:59:36PM -0800, Greg Mirsky wrote:
> thank you for pointing to the sloppy terminology I've used referring to
> what is the proposed update to RFC 5880. In fact, the draft,
