A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection WG of the
IETF.
Title : Optimizing BFD Authentication
Authors : Mahesh Jethanandani
Ash
Hi Jeff,
Version -07 of the draft addresses this comment. Thanks.
> On Oct 30, 2018, at 12:33 AM, Mahesh Jethanandani
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
>> On Oct 29, 2018, at 9:10 AM, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
>>
>> Mahesh,
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 09:24:59PM -0700, Greg Mirsky wrote:
>>> thank you f
Working Group,
As is our custom, the BFD wiki has been updated with current status of the
group and known documents. You are encouraged to review it.
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/bfd/wiki
-- Jeff & Reshad
The BFD WG has placed draft-chen-bfd-unsolicited in state
Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Jeffrey Haas)
The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-bfd-unsolicited/
Comment:
WG adoption call ending 2018-11-09
Here are my comments.
Thanks,
Anoop
==
Philosophical
Since VXLAN is not an IETF standard, should we be defining a standard for
running BFD on it? Should we define BFD over Geneve instead which is the
official WG selection? Is that going to be a separate document?
Technical
Section 1:
This
Hi Anoop,
thank you for your thorough review and the comments. I'm traveling over the
weekend and will respond in details later next week.
Regards,
Greg
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 4:58 PM Anoop Ghanwani wrote:
>
> Here are my comments.
>
> Thanks,
> Anoop
>
> ==
>
> Philosophical
>
> Since VXLAN is
Hi Anoop,
thank you for your thorough review and the comments you've shared. Please
find my answers below tagged GIM>>.
Regards,
Greg
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 4:58 PM Anoop Ghanwani wrote:
>
> Here are my comments.
>
> Thanks,
> Anoop
>
> ==
>
> Philosophical
>
> Since VXLAN is not an IETF standa
