Hi Jeff,
please see below.
On 15.10.18 20:30, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
Mirja,
You keep waving around RFC 8085 as a panacea.
My discuss is actually based on what is specified in the BFD base spec
in RFC5880. I'm only pointing you to RFC8085 because this RFC gives
guidance how to resolve the issue.
The BFD WG has placed draft-haas-bfd-large-packets in state
Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Reshad Rahman)
The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haas-bfd-large-packets/
Comment:
Lots of interest + discussions at IETF102.
Yes/support.
Regards,
Reshad.
From: Rtg-bfd on behalf of "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)"
Date: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 at 9:06 PM
To: "rtg-bfd@ietf.org"
Subject: BFD WG adoption for draft-haas-bfd-large-packets
Hello BFD WG,
We have received an adoption request for “BFD encapsulated in large
Hello Chairs,
I am unaware of any IPR other than the one already disclosed.
Thanks
Prasad
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Haas
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 03:44
To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bfd-vx...@ietf.org
Subject: WGLC for draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan, ending November 9
Workin
