Hi Martin,
please see below.
> Am 05.10.2018 um 10:57 schrieb Martin Vigoureux :
>
> Hello Mirja,
>
> time has passed since the last exchanges on that. To reinitiate the
> discussion, I come back to your original points.
>
>
> Le 2018-07-03 à 20:31, Mirja Kühlewind a écrit :
>> Mirja Kühlewi
Hi Greg,
But all packets that indicate a state change are authenticated. That has been
the original premise of the draft, with or without a Detect Multiplier.
For example, we say in Section 1
This document proposes that only BFD frames that signal a state
change in BFD be authenticated.
Mirja,
You keep waving around RFC 8085 as a panacea. Consider:
: 4.1. Multicast Congestion Control Guidelines
:
:Applications using multicast SHOULD provide appropriate congestion
:control.
Firstly, it's a SHOULD, and not a MUST. Also, I believe we've made the
point more than once th
Hi Mahesh,
thank you for your quick response. The comment regarding the state change,
as I understand from the minutes, came from Jeff.
Yes, the question was about the periodic authentication in Up state. I
believe that at the meeting WG arrived at a very good solution and we've
agreed to make the
