Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-yang-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-07-30 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Hi Reshad, On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:16:05AM +, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) wrote: > Hi Benjamin and Jeff, > > Following our discussion in Montreal, would the following, or something along > these lines, be OK with you in the Security Considerations section. > >When BFD clients are used to

IETF 102 - BFD draft minutes

2018-07-30 Thread Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
BFD WG, The draft minutes have been uploaded, please review them. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-102-bfd/ Regards, Reshad & Jeff.

Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-yang-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-07-30 Thread PFFC JHAAS
Benjamin, Your proposal would be fine. It basically says be mindful of the relationship. Jeff > On Jul 30, 2018, at 10:41, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > Hi Reshad, > >> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:16:05AM +, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) wrote: >> Hi Benjamin and Jeff, >> >> Following our discussi

Comments are welcomed. // New Version Notification for draft-hu-bier-bfd-01.txt

2018-07-30 Thread hu.fangwei
Hi, all The BIER BFD document is updated to new version( https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hu-bier-bfd-01.txt) according to the comments from Jeffrey, Donald and Greg. The main changes are as following: (1) Removing the definition of BIER OAM packet format, and referring it from B