Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-07-02 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-18: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https

Re: WGLC BFD Authentication Drafts

2018-07-02 Thread Mahesh Jethanandani
Picking up on this thread. The way to look at this draft is, that it suggests which frames will undergo authentication. This draft does not suggest any change to the state machine, or believe it causes a change in it. Frames that need authentication will carry the NULL Auth TLV. If they are not

Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-16

2018-07-02 Thread Jeffrey Haas
Carlos, On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 05:17:20AM +, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) wrote: [...] > I do not believe the question was whether S-BFD or any other protocol > followed the behavior. It’s a question about this document. > > For correctness, S-BFD (RFC 7880) did not miss to define PointToPoi

Re: WGLC BFD Authentication Drafts

2018-07-02 Thread Greg Mirsky
Hi Mahesh, you've said: If three or more frames are discarded because one or all three of them were marked with NULL Auth TLV, and all of them fail authentication, the receiver brings the session down. Again, this is no different from three or more unauthenticated or meticulously authenticated fr

Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-16

2018-07-02 Thread Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
Jeff, On Jul 2, 2018, at 2:09 PM, Jeffrey Haas mailto:jh...@pfrc.org>> wrote: Carlos, On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 05:17:20AM +, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) wrote: [...] I do not believe the question was whether S-BFD or any other protocol followed the behavior. It’s a question about this docum

Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-active-tail-09: (with COMMENT)

2018-07-02 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-active-tail-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Plea

Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-18: (with COMMENT)

2018-07-02 Thread Ben Campbell
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-18: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to ht

Ben Campbell's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-active-tail-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-07-02 Thread Ben Campbell
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-active-tail-09: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refe

Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-18: (with COMMENT)

2018-07-02 Thread Adam Roach
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-18: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to http

Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-active-tail-09: (with COMMENT)

2018-07-02 Thread Adam Roach
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-active-tail-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please r