Hi Linda,
thank you for the review and your kind words, much appreciated.
If an end-point during the p2mp BFD session never responded to the head's
multicast poll it is unknown to the head and cannot be reported as
"inactive tail". I can imagine that if the head has been given the list of
the tail
Greg,
Thanks for the reply.
It might be too late to ask this question, I am curious if the head-end is
aware of the list of end points, what is wrong if they just use unicast BFD to
each of them? Multicast-BFD seems requires more support of the network, isn’t
it?
Linda
From: Greg Mirsky [mai
Hi Tom,
many thanks for taking interest in the topic and helping with details on
GUE and OAM. I've reviewed the listed in the draft encapsulations and
analyzed how active OAM may be identified in each of the cases. For active
OAM to be more useful the test packets must be in-band with the data that
Hi Linda,
thank you for the question. Always happy to discuss the technology.
If the head is required to know the state of the set of the tails, then
using p2p BFD session between the head and each of such tails may be the
right solution. But it may be challenging to ensure that the unicast path
f
