Hi Ketan,
much obliged by you kind comment on BFD Directed work. The issue with IP
network convergence is the reason we've started work to enable optional
control of the reverse path of BFD session over p2p MPLS LSP.
My concern with the current text of draft-ali-spring-bfd-sr-policy is that
the con
The BFD Yang document has beens submitted to the IESG.
I'd like to thank the members of the BFD Yang design team, the authors, and
the Working Group on the effort that went into this document. Yang
documents in general are difficult things to write, especially with the
evolution of the technology
Hi,
In the BFD meeting yesterday there was discussion about lack of clarity on what
the spec says wrt to the discriminator TLV being sent by the egress node in the
echo reply and that this causes interop issues. From RFC 5884:
The egress LSR MAY respond with an LSP Ping Echo
reply message th
Hi Reshad,
your analysis of the text is absolutely correct. My concern is the possible
analysis of the Discriminator by ingress LER and it comparing to My
Discriminator of the received BFD control packets. According to the RFC
5884 both must match but because LSP Echo reply does not provide suffici
Hi Carlos,
if the group agrees that I'm overparanoid I'll accept that and forever hold
my peace.
Regards, Greg
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018, 7:00 PM Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) <
cpign...@cisco.com> wrote:
> Hi, Greg,
>
>
>
> That, to me, reads like over-specifying. Are you aware of any
> implementation
Hi, Greg,
That, to me, reads like over-specifying. Are you aware of any implementation
attempting to do that?
There’s no text for that comparison – why would an implementation do that?
Thanks,
Carlos.
From: Greg Mirsky
Date: Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 12:18 PM
To: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)"
