RE: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review:

2018-02-22 Thread Ravi Singh
Hi Reshad Thanks for your response. > We’ve done what you suggested by defining groupings for the common > information, so although you see repetitions in the YANG trees, there is no > repetition in the YANG modules. Got it. Thanks Ravi From: Reshad Rahman (rrahman) [mailto:rrah...@cisco.com]

Re: Call for topics - IETF 101, London

2018-02-22 Thread Greg Mirsky
Hi Jeff, Reshad, et. al, thank you for the opportunity to present and discuss new BFD works in London. I'd like to propose the following topics: - use of BFD Demand mode in BFD over MPLS p2p LSP (based on draft-mirsky-bfd-mpls-demand); - non-IP encapsulation of BFD control packet over p2m

RE: WGLC on draft-ietf-bfd-yang

2018-02-22 Thread Qin Wu
I have read v-(09) of draft-ietf-bfd-yang and have a few comments and suggestions: 1. I think tree diagram defined in this draft should follow notation defined in draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams Suggest to add a new section 1.1 as follows: “ 1.1 Tree Diagrams Tree diagrams used in th