Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5884 (5085)

2017-08-22 Thread Balaji Rajagopalan
Hi Greg, In all the three cases, the return mode field in the Echo request packet was set to 2 (Reply via an IPv4/IPv6 UDP packet). -- Balaji Rajagopalan From: Greg Mirsky Date: Wednesday, 16 August 2017 at 8:27 PM To: Balaji Rajagopalan Cc: Jeffrey Haas , Kireeti Kompella , Thomas Nadeau ,

Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5884 (5085)

2017-08-22 Thread Balaji Rajagopalan
That sounds better. How about the following text? The egress LSR MUST follow the procedures described in [RFC4379] in processing the LSP Ping request. The LSP Ping reply generated by the egress MAY carry the local discriminator assigned by it for the BFD session. -- Balaji Rajagopalan From: Ma

Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5884 (5085)

2017-08-22 Thread Greg Mirsky
Hi Balaji, I've been thinking about the value of including BFD Discriminator TLV in echo reply sent by egress. What we'd expect ingress to do upon receiving the reply? Match to bfd.remoteDiscr? I think that then echo reply must include the value from the original BFD Discriminator TLV so that ingre