On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 03:58:06PM -0700, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
> The changes are done and pushed to GitHub. Use the grouping client-cfg-parms.
Question: For implementations that use Echo mode, is that something the
protocol client configuration impacts or is it chosen by the system
automatic
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 05:14:28PM +, Yingzhen Qu wrote:
> Please see attached ospf bfd module. Base ospf module also needs to be
> updated to remove the bfd enable leaf. ISIS model need to do the same change,
> ietf-isis-bfd.yang will look the same as ietf-ospf-bfd.yang.
>
> Please let me k
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:25:38AM +, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) wrote:
> I had not suggested it, but I think that idea has merit. If there are enough
> updates needed to the spec based on additional running-code learning, or
> ambiguities that are causing interoperable confusion, the net of
Working Group,
We've received some good feedback for Santosh to include in the next
revision of the documents and likely have enough discussion to move them
forward in the publication process.
At this point, we are waiting for targeted review from ALU/Nokia who
actually has an implementation of t
Hi Mahesh,
For the enable flag, I'd prefer to have it defined directly in ospf instead of
using a grouping from BFD. I'm not sure how useful this grouping is, am I
missing something?
Thanks,
Yingzhen
-Original Message-
From: Mahesh Jethanandani [mailto:mjethanand...@gmail.com]
Sent: S
Working Group,
This draft was briefly mentioned as part of the IDR WG presentation on
RS-BFD that I am a co-author on. That presentation is supposed to be linked
here, but is not coming up. Hopefully it's a transient error:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/materials/slides-99-idr-03-idr-
Hi Mahesh,
On 7/31/17, 12:42 AM, "Mahesh Jethanandani"
wrote:
>Yingzhen,
>
>Overall the model looks good to me.
>
>I notice that you decided to (re)define the enable flag in the model. Is
>that intentional?
>
>You are aware that there is another grouping called client-base-cfg-parms
>that defin
Sigh, I mean “why don’t you add ‘enabled’…"
On 7/31/17, 2:56 PM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" wrote:
>Hi Mahesh,
>
>On 7/31/17, 12:42 AM, "Mahesh Jethanandani"
>wrote:
>
>>Yingzhen,
>>
>>Overall the model looks good to me.
>>
>>I notice that you decided to (re)define the enable flag in the model. Is
>
Yingzhen,
How do you plan to indicate to the BFD engine that the session is enabled?
> On Jul 31, 2017, at 10:26 AM, Yingzhen Qu wrote:
>
> Hi Mahesh,
>
> For the enable flag, I'd prefer to have it defined directly in ospf instead
> of using a grouping from BFD. I'm not sure how useful this
Ok. Will do.
> On Jul 31, 2017, at 12:05 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>
> Sigh, I mean “why don’t you add ‘enabled’…"
>
> On 7/31/17, 2:56 PM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" wrote:
>
>> Hi Mahesh,
>>
>> On 7/31/17, 12:42 AM, "Mahesh Jethanandani"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yingzhen,
>>>
>>> Overall the mod
Jeff,
> On Jul 31, 2017, at 10:05 AM, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 03:58:06PM -0700, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
>> The changes are done and pushed to GitHub. Use the grouping client-cfg-parms.
>
> Question: For implementations that use Echo mode, is that something the
> proto
Mahesh,
> On Jul 31, 2017, at 4:26 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani
> wrote:
>
> Jeff,
>
>> On Jul 31, 2017, at 10:05 AM, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 03:58:06PM -0700, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
>>> The changes are done and pushed to GitHub. Use the grouping
>>> client-cfg-parm
>From what I understand, the echo intervals have an inverse relationship with
>their control interval counterparts. Faster echo allows for slower control
>frame rate. So they are necessarily different values. That said, having never
>implemented echo mode, I can't comment how they should get gro
> On Jul 31, 2017, at 1:55 PM, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
>
> Mahesh,
>
>> On Jul 31, 2017, at 4:26 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani
>> wrote:
>>
>> Jeff,
>>
>>> On Jul 31, 2017, at 10:05 AM, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 03:58:06PM -0700, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
The changes
14 matches
Mail list logo
