Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-yang-06.txt

2017-07-28 Thread Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
Hi Acee, Got rid of ietf-bfd-clients. I have added example-bfd-client module to provide an example. Regards, Reshad. On 2017-07-27, 10:34 PM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" wrote: >Hi Reshad, > >Ok - I see now. I was looking at the wrong -base-cfg-parms groupings. >Fewer similar grouping and modu

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-yang-06.txt

2017-07-28 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Thanks much Reshad - Yingzhen will be adding but the ietf-ospf-bfd module to the OSPF model and draft. Acee On 7/28/17, 11:08 AM, "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" wrote: >Hi Acee, > >Got rid of ietf-bfd-clients. I have added example-bfd-client module to >provide an example. > >Regards, >Reshad. > > >

RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-yang-06.txt

2017-07-28 Thread Yingzhen Qu
Hi Reshad, Thanks for the update and example. I'll get ospf part done this weekend. Thanks, Yingzhen -Original Message- From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 8:56 AM To: Reshad Rahman (rrahman) ; Yingzhen Qu ; Jeffrey Haas ; rtg-bfd@ietf.org Cc:

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-yang-06.txt

2017-07-28 Thread Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
Thanks Yingzhen. FYI I will be on holiday for the next 2 weeks. Acee, can you please get in touch with ISIS YANG authors? Regards, Reshad. On 2017-07-28, 12:25 PM, "Yingzhen Qu" wrote: >Hi Reshad, > >Thanks for the update and example. I'll get ospf part done this weekend. > >Thanks, >Yingzhen

RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-yang-06.txt

2017-07-28 Thread Yingzhen Qu
Hi Reshad, I'll also take care of the ISIS part. Enjoy your vocation! Thanks, Yingzhen -Original Message- From: Reshad Rahman (rrahman) [mailto:rrah...@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 9:29 AM To: Yingzhen Qu ; Acee Lindem (acee) ; Jeffrey Haas ; rtg-bfd@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-yang-06.txt

2017-07-28 Thread Mahesh Jethanandani
Would it not be better to call bfd-grouping-base-cfg-parms something like bfd-grouping-client-cfg-params or more simply client-cfg-params. We know it is a grouping and we know it is a bfd grouping. Why repeat? > On Jul 27, 2017, at 7:34 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > > Hi Reshad, > > Ok - I

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-yang-06.txt

2017-07-28 Thread Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
I am fine with this proposal. It will impact other groupings also. On 2017-07-28, 5:25 PM, "Mahesh Jethanandani" wrote: >Would it not be better to call bfd-grouping-base-cfg-parms something like >bfd-grouping-client-cfg-params or more simply client-cfg-params. We know >it is a grouping and we

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-yang-06.txt

2017-07-28 Thread Mahesh Jethanandani
But do those groupings impact IGP models? I can take a stab at making the changes before the weekend. > On Jul 28, 2017, at 2:42 PM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) > wrote: > > I am fine with this proposal. It will impact other groupings also. > > > > On 2017-07-28, 5:25 PM, "Mahesh Jethanandani"

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-yang-06.txt

2017-07-28 Thread Mahesh Jethanandani
The changes are done and pushed to GitHub. Use the grouping client-cfg-parms. > On Jul 28, 2017, at 2:44 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani > wrote: > > But do those groupings impact IGP models? > > I can take a stab at making the changes before the weekend. > >> On Jul 28, 2017, at 2:42 PM, Reshad Rahm