Re: draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-09

2022-02-27 Thread Gyan Mishra
Hi Reshad On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 12:02 PM Reshad Rahman wrote: > Hi Gyan, > > As stated below, this document specifies how classical BFD (RFC5880) > sessions can be initiated only by 1 side. This is orthogonal to use of > demand mode or echo mode in BFD (which can be used once the sessions are

Re: draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-09

2022-02-27 Thread Gyan Mishra
Hi Reshad On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 11:09 AM Reshad Rahman wrote: > Hi Gyan, > > Please see inline. > > On Sunday, February 20, 2022, 12:29:45 PM EST, Gyan Mishra < > hayabusa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Understood as it only applies to Classical BFD with 3 way handshake which > would preclude S-

Re: draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-09

2022-02-27 Thread Reshad Rahman
Hi Gyan, Please see inline. On Sunday, February 20, 2022, 12:29:45 PM EST, Gyan Mishra wrote: Understood as it only applies to Classical BFD with 3 way handshake which would preclude S-BFD which does not have 3-way handshake and I believe that is why it does not apply. Once the sessi

Re: draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-09

2022-02-20 Thread Gyan Mishra
Hi Reshad We discussed OSPF strict mode and that is a change to OSPF to run in strict mode meaning allow BFD to come up before OSPF, and I asked Robert Raszuk on that drafts WGLC and we agreed that unsolicited BFD is not applicable to strict mode. In theory the thought was with unsolicited BFD to

Re: draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-09

2022-02-20 Thread Gyan Mishra
Understood as it only applies to Classical BFD with 3 way handshake which would preclude S-BFD which does not have 3-way handshake and I believe that is why it does not apply. Once the session is up per RFC 588O the session switches to Demand mode with D bit and initiate Poll sequence P bit and F

Re: draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-09

2022-02-20 Thread Reshad Rahman
Hi Gyan, BFD strict mode below specifies how OSPF signals its requirement for BFD to be up. If you have OSPF at each end, no need for "unsolicited BFD". Regards,Reshad. On Sunday, February 13, 2022, 03:03:19 PM EST, Gyan Mishra wrote: Hi Reshad  Also I think unsolicited BFD should app

Re: draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-09

2022-02-20 Thread Reshad Rahman
Hi Gyan, As stated below, this document specifies how classical BFD (RFC5880) sessions can be initiated only by 1 side. This is orthogonal to use of demand mode or echo mode in BFD (which can be used once the sessions are up, whether "unsolicited BFD" has been used or not). S-BFD has its own pr

Re: draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-09

2022-02-13 Thread Gyan Mishra
Hi Reshad Also I think unsolicited BFD should apply as well to BFD strict mode. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode I will comment on that thread. Kind Regards Gyan On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 2:59 PM Gyan Mishra wrote: > > Hi Reshad > > Could this unsolici

Re: draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-09

2022-02-13 Thread Gyan Mishra
Hi Reshad Could this unsolicited BFD concept be applied to S-BFD RFC 7880, 7881, 7885? Also could it be applied to RFC 5880 demand mode? I will review through the draft again for any further comments. Many Thanks Gyan On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 12:04 PM Reshad Rahman wrote: > Hi Gyan, > > Apo

Re: draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited-09

2022-02-13 Thread Reshad Rahman
Hi Gyan, Apologies for the delay and thanks for the feedback. The document is applicable to single-hop and multi-hop. In the next revision, we will clarify this and extend the YANG model to include multi-hop. The "unsolicited BFD" procedure allows a BFD session to be initiated only by 1 side. On