RE: A question about Encapsulation of BFD for SRv6 Policy

2022-11-14 Thread Chenmengxiao
g-bfd-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of linchangwang Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2022 6:36 AM To: Greg Mirsky mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com>>; spring mailto:spr...@ietf.org>> Cc: rtg-bfd WG mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: A question about Encapsulation of

RE: A question about Encapsulation of BFD for SRv6 Policy

2022-11-11 Thread Alexander Vainshtein
node, only of the address that represents the Service SID. My 2c, Sasha From: Rtg-bfd On Behalf Of linchangwang Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2022 6:36 AM To: Greg Mirsky ; spring Cc: rtg-bfd WG Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: A question about Encapsulation of BFD for SRv6 Policy Hi Greg, The

RE: A question about Encapsulation of BFD for SRv6 Policy

2022-11-09 Thread linchangwang
Hi Greg, The differences between the SRH of user data and bfd packet: 1. The encapsulations of user data usually include a Service-SID in the SRH, but the encapsulations of BFD does not. 2. In order to make sure the BFD control packet can reach the tail-end, IPv6 address of the ta