Working Group,
A followup on this item.
Currently, the status is identical to that which was last posted. Mahesh
did make contact with Ciena IPR holders regarding the state of the license.
It is their belief that their disclosure is consistent with similar IPR
filed against BFD. Citing two simi
Hi Tom,
We are in the process of refreshing all the drafts that have expired.
Cheers.
> On Feb 19, 2019, at 5:55 PM, tom petch wrote:
>
> Jeff
>
> Two of the three I-D you mention have timed out and are not available
> through the usual channels.
>
> I suggest that the first step needs to be
Jeff
Two of the three I-D you mention have timed out and are not available
through the usual channels.
I suggest that the first step needs to be a refresh so that they are
available.
(Yes, I know I can jump through hoops and find obsoleted I-Ds but life
is too short:-)
Tom Petch
- Original
Hi Jeff,
thank you for the clear and concise summary. I need to note that my
concerns are not only with how late the IPR Disclosure was made but, I want
to stress, with the licensing terms set forth by the holder of IPR that
allow for possible request of royalties from an implementor.
Regards,
Gre
Working Group,
On March 28, 2018, we started Working Group Last Call on the following document
bundle:
draft-ietf-bfd-secure-sequence-numbers
draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authentication
draft-ietf-bfd-stability
The same day, Mahesh Jethanandani acknowledged there was pending IPR
declarations
