Hi Jeff,
I just took a look at -07, thanks for the updates. I am good with the changes
made, ack for your response wrt operational data.
- Section 4.2: do we need 2119 language for the following paragraph and should
the should be a MUST?
In the case multiple BFD clients desire to test the sam
Reshad,
Sorry about the -06 noise; I posted the template rather than the generated
document. See -07 for updates.
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 02:40:34PM +, Reshad Rahman wrote:
> Regarding the grouping for pdu-size, that would also be helpful for BFD
> clients to include it (if needed) in thei
Regarding the grouping for pdu-size, that would also be helpful for BFD
clients to include it (if needed) in their config model.
Regards,Reshad.
On Friday, March 29, 2024, 01:32:21 PM EDT, Reshad Rahman
wrote:
Jeff, Albert,
Thank you for the doc update. With work travel and the email
Jeff, Albert,
Thank you for the doc update. With work travel and the email flurry on
optimized authentication, this one slipped through.
On the YANG model, I believe the replicated portion with leaf pdu-size etc
should be a grouping.
I was also thinking that some extra operational data would be
Working Group,
After a fumble in -04, -05 updates -03's republish earlier this week with a
YANG module to configure the padded size.
Comments are appreciated. YANG doctor review will be getting requested as
we hopefuly move this forward soon.
-- Jeff and Albert
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:09:02
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets-05.txt is now available. It is a
work item of the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) WG of the IETF.
Title: BFD Encapsulated in Large Packets
Authors: Jeffrey Haas
Albert Fu
Name:draft-ietf-bfd-large-packets-05.txt
Pag
