Re: [internet-dra...@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-haas-bfd-large-packets-00.txt]

2018-07-10 Thread Jeffrey Haas
Greg, On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:40:00AM +, Greg Mirsky wrote: > thank you for bringing up for discussion this interesting proposal. A > question and a comment ahead of the meeting to save us time: > >- which applications will benefit from monitoring path MTU (PMTU) rather >from using

Re: WGLC BFD Authentication Drafts

2018-07-10 Thread Mahesh Jethanandani
Hi Jeff, Thanks for the reminder. My co-author was supposed to have taken care of this. Let me have him give us an update. Ankur? > On Jul 10, 2018, at 7:16 PM, Jeffrey Haas wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 01:41:51PM -0400, Jeffrey Haas wrote: >> Mahesh, >> >> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:33

Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-yang-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-07-10 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
On 7/10/18, 7:46 PM, "Rtg-bfd on behalf of Jeffrey Haas" wrote: On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 10:56:49PM -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 03:20:42AM +, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) wrote: > > I am not 100% sure I understand the point being made. Is it a question o

Re: WGLC BFD Authentication Drafts

2018-07-10 Thread Jeffrey Haas
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 01:41:51PM -0400, Jeffrey Haas wrote: > Mahesh, > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:33:23AM -0700, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote: > > Chairs, > > > > We the authors acknowledge an IPRs related to these drafts. It is titled > > “Integrity check optimization systems and methods in l

Re: Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-yang-16: (with COMMENT)

2018-07-10 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 4:30 PM, Jeffrey Haas wrote: > [Note that I'm making this comment for posterity so that the IESG doesn't > ask the same thing of other draft authors.] > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 06:18:42AM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 6:10 AM, Reshad Rahman (rrah

Re: Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-18: (with DISCUSS)

2018-07-10 Thread Jeffrey Haas
Mirja, On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 04:01:22PM +0200, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) wrote: > > Am 05.07.2018 um 21:27 schrieb Greg Mirsky : > > GIM>> I believe that such limit will negatively impact applicability of > > this method to detect defects in networks. Analysis of BFD transmission > > intervals p

Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-yang-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-07-10 Thread Jeffrey Haas
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 10:56:49PM -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 03:20:42AM +, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) wrote: > > I am not 100% sure I understand the point being made. Is it a question > > of underlying the importance of having the IGPs authenticated since the > > IG

Re: Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-bfd-yang-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-07-10 Thread Jeffrey Haas
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 06:33:16PM +0200, Martin Vigoureux wrote: > Hello Alissa, > > thanks for your review. > I'm fine with discussing this but wonder if we should tie it to this draft. > I would prefer that we collectively discuss that and once we reach a > decision we start applying it. It's

Re: Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-bfd-yang-16: (with COMMENT)

2018-07-10 Thread Jeffrey Haas
[Note that I'm making this comment for posterity so that the IESG doesn't ask the same thing of other draft authors.] On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 06:18:42AM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote: > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 6:10 AM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) > wrote: > > The pyang tool does this for real references