Hi Greg,
I am familiar with draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed and that it provides a way for
signalling the reverse path to be used by the egress. This relies on LSP ping
bootstrap. Fully support this work in general.
When using SBFD for monitoring of SR Policy, the reverse path failure can cause
f
Jeffrey Haas has requested publication of draft-ietf-bfd-yang-13 as Proposed
Standard on behalf of the BFD working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-yang/
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection WG of the
IETF.
Title : YANG Data Model for Bidirectional Forwarding
Detection (BFD)
Authors : Reshad Rahman
Hi Greg,
Is the goal to be adopted by BFD WG (the draft says BFD Working Group)? If so,
it should be renamed to draft-mirsky-bfd-mpls-p2mp. OTOH I don’t see any
proposed BFD changes in this draft, so is this targeted for MPLS WG?
Thanks,
Reshad.
Hi Ketan,
I'd point that even though you believe that S-BFD session monitors only the
SR tunnel, it, in fact, monitors the return path from egress to the ingress
of the tunnel. And that is where convergence of the IP network will play
role. I can provide you with more detailed explanation of the sc
Thank you Juergen, will do. I had updated references for the new RFC8343 and
8349 but missed these docs.
Regards,
Reshad.
On 2018-03-21, 8:51 AM, "Juergen Schoenwaelder"
wrote:
Reshad,
this looks good. You proabably also want to update references to point
to the RFCs that ju
Hi Greg,
S-BFD allows for continuous monitoring of the SR path corresponding to the SR
Policy. The proposal is to use it for continuous monitoring. This is where
there is perhaps a disconnect?
They key part is that the authors of draft-ali-spring-bfd-sr-policy do not
propose to have ANY SR pol
Reshad,
this looks good. You proabably also want to update references to point
to the RFCs that just recently appeared:
- replace [I-D.ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams] with [RFC8340]
- replace [I-D.ietf-netmod-revised-datastores] with [RFC8342]
- replace [I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis] with [RFC8344]
