== '\n') fflush(f);
! }
}
This strikes me as a pretty serious bug; I hope you will consider
releasing a patch release with this fix (or an equivalent one, if you
don't like how I fixed it) soon.
Thank you,
Jonathan Kamens
--
To unsubscribe or
c has already hosed one of
our production machines at work several times as a result of this bug,
I'm somewhat reluctant to test something that may still manifest the
bug in some cases, especially when the solution I've already got works
great.
Jonathan Kamens
--
To unsubscribe or chan
Earlier today, I wrote:
> I don't agree that this is a better solution, especially given your
> comment in the last sentence above.
Please allow me to recant my previous testimony :-).
In the worst-case scenario, your solution causes one extra level of
recursion into rwrite, whereas with my s
upcoming releases?
Thanks,
Jonathan Kamens
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Is this list a member of rsync...@samba.org? I've started getting
notifications sent to that list by bugzilla, and I'm guessing it's
because I've subscribed to this list. I don't care to receive the
bugzilla notifications. Is there really no way to subscribe to this
discussion list without rece
No answer to this? None at all? Frustrating.
jik
On 10/9/2011 1:28 AM, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
Greetings,
I submitted a patch for a new feature for rsync through bugzilla last
December.
Wayne said he was leaning toward including the new feature I proposed
in rsync 3.1.
Nearly ten
