Re: using rsync with Mac OS X

2002-02-05 Thread Terrence Geernaert
OK, I'm brand new to this group, brand new to rsync, brand new to unix in general. I'm trying to play catch up with this discussion so there are likely many misconceptions that I have about these issues. My goal is to create a tool that does backup and restore only transferring changes. It will

Re: using rsync with Mac OS X

2002-02-05 Thread Terrence Geernaert
OK, I'm brand new to this group, brand new to rsync, brand new to unix in general. I'm trying to play catch up with this discussion so there are likely many misconceptions that I have about these issues. My goal is to create a tool that does backup and restore only transferring changes. It will

Re: using rsync with Mac OS X

2001-12-18 Thread Mark Valence
So, that's one vote each for options 1, 2, and 3 ;-) I agree that the ideal implementation would support HFS+ as well as netatalk's .AppleDouble scheme, Mac OS X's ._ scheme, and MacBinary for all the rest. This can certainly be a goal of the implementation, but personally I am interested in

Re: using rsync with Mac OS X

2001-12-17 Thread Chris Irvine
I would lean toward option "1" for several reasons. Primarily it could probably inter-operate safely with non-HFS or older versions. How about a flag that changes the mode to detect named forks and encode them in-line. These encoded files could be safely synced to non-forked storage destination

Re: using rsync with Mac OS X

2001-12-17 Thread David Feldman
ED]> > To: Mark Valence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: using rsync with Mac OS X > Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 09:17:44 -0600 > > --==_Exmh_771008192P > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > >> From: Mark Valence <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: using rsync with Mac OS X

2001-12-17 Thread Chris Garrigues
> From: Mark Valence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 22:26:04 -0500 > > 1) convert (on the fly) all files to MacBinary before > comparing/sending them to the destination. MacBinary is a well > documented way to package an HFS file into a single data file. The > benefits with th

Re: using rsync with Mac OS X

2001-12-16 Thread Mark Valence
As David Feldman wrote recently, rsync looks like it would be very useful for Mac OS X systems, where there is currently a dearth of options for backup. I am looking into using rsync to backup/mirror a few systems, but there are two changes that I will need to make first, based on two file s

using rsync with Mac OS X

2001-12-04 Thread David Feldman
Rsync looks like a good tool for keeping files synchronized between two computers, such as a desktop and laptop. However, Mac OS uses a forked file system, with the second fork storing data critical to some files (such as applications) as well as type and creator information matching files up