Re: unexpected EOF hypothesis

2000-10-18 Thread Scott McDermott
Neil Schellenberger on Tue 17/10 23:55 -0400: > In particular, is anyone who is using --timeout=0 (the default) on the > server nonetheless seeing unexpected EOF? It's been a while, but to my recollection, yes, I didn't (never have) set any timeout values, but I still got this error at seemingly

Re: unexpected EOF hypothesis

2000-10-17 Thread Eric Whiting
> Eventually, though, writefd_unbuffered() will be called. The last > recv_generator() log message will vary depending on how many files > need updates (i.e. how many bytes are written to the buffer). The > call to writefd_unbuffered() will trigger a call to select() with both > a write mask (wi

unexpected EOF hypothesis

2000-10-17 Thread Neil Schellenberger
[ Another excruciatingly long post. Sorry. ] Folks, I think I may finally have the answer to the riddle of (at least one kind of) the dreaded unexpected EOF. One caveat though: I don't have (easy) access to the server to actually observe directly on it; I'm going on strictly on truss/snoop of