On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 10:21:04PM -0700, Craig Barratt wrote:
> Probably the best solution is to add a flag argument to sum_init(void)
> to request whether to add checksum_seed or not.
How about this similar idea: change sum_init() to take a seed value as
an arg. Then, call it with sum_init(0)
Wayne Davison writes:
> On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 02:25:11PM -0700, Craig Barratt wrote:
> > Any feedback on this patch and the possibility of getting it
> > into CVS or the patches directory?
>
> The file checksum-seed.diff was put into the patches dir on the 2nd of
> May. Strangely, I don't seem
Wayne Davison writes:
> On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 02:25:11PM -0700, Craig Barratt wrote:
> > Any feedback on this patch and the possibility of getting it
> > into CVS or the patches directory?
>
> The file checksum-seed.diff was put into the patches dir on the 2nd of
> May. Strangely, I don't seem
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 02:25:11PM -0700, Craig Barratt wrote:
> Any feedback on this patch and the possibility of getting it
> into CVS or the patches directory?
The file checksum-seed.diff was put into the patches dir on the 2nd of
May. Strangely, I don't seem to have sent any email indicating
Subject: Re: setting checksum_seed
jw schultz writes:
> > > There was some talk last year about adding a --fixed-checksum-seed
> > > option, but no consensus was reached. It shouldn't hurt to make the
> > > seed value constant for certain applications, though, s
jw schultz writes:
> > > There was some talk last year about adding a --fixed-checksum-seed
> > > option, but no consensus was reached. It shouldn't hurt to make the
> > > seed value constant for certain applications, though, so you can feel
> > > free to proceed in that direction for what you're
