On 2018-03-14 10:29 AM, Kevin Korb via rsync wrote:
> It would still be downloading the whole file only to write out a new
> one. Rsync writes out a whole new file because it assumes it is doing
> so locally. The source of that new file can be a combination of parts
> of the existing file and par
It would still be downloading the whole file only to write out a new
one. Rsync writes out a whole new file because it assumes it is doing
so locally. The source of that new file can be a combination of parts
of the existing file and parts of the remote file but it still writes
the whole thing.
On 2018-03-14 09:41 AM, Lentes, Bernd via rsync wrote:
>
> also when the target is a cifs share, it's still considered as local ?
> Is there something i can do to get the diff algorithm used ?
> Copying via ssh to the cifs server is unfortunately not possible.
>
If you really wanted to, you cou
On 2018-03-14 10:07 AM, Kevin Korb via rsync wrote:
> --no-whole-file would only make it even worse. It would have to read
> the remote file over the network in order to do the diff then it would
> write the whole file over the network anyway (--inplace would help a
> little). Local copies force
Yes you're right, rsync would update only a few parts of the file, but
network usage would be even worst.
The only solution would finally be to have rsync on the target system.
Ben
On 14 Mar, Kevin Korb via rsync wrote:
--no-whole-file would only make it even worse. It would have to read
th
--no-whole-file would only make it even worse. It would have to read
the remote file over the network in order to do the diff then it would
write the whole file over the network anyway (--inplace would help a
little). Local copies force --whole-file for a good reason.
On 03/14/2018 10:05 AM, Ben
On 14 Mar 2018, Lentes, Bernd via rsync wrote:
- On Mar 14, 2018, at 2:19 PM, Ben RUBSON ben.rub...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 Mar 2018, Lentes, Bernd via rsync wrote:
I would now expect a rsync from the snap would transfer just some megay
bytes to the file from the day before.
But it doesn'
no backup - no mercy
- On Mar 14, 2018, at 2:19 PM, Ben RUBSON ben.rub...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 14 Mar 2018, Lentes, Bernd via rsync wrote:
>
>> I would now expect a rsync from the snap would transfer just some megay
>> bytes to the file from the day before.
>> But it doesn't:
>>
>> ha-idg
On 14 Mar 2018, Lentes, Bernd via rsync wrote:
I would now expect a rsync from the snap would transfer just some megay
bytes to the file from the day before.
But it doesn't:
ha-idg-1:/cluster/guests/servers_alive # time rsync -av --stats
sa.raw.snap /mnt/idg-2/SysAdmin_AG_Wurst/backup/clust
Hi,
i have some virtual machines running on logical volumes formatted with OCFS2.
I'd like to snapshot the running guests
to backup them easily afterwards. The files of the guests are big (100 -
300GB), but the content changes only slowly.
So i thought that rsync would be a great benefit because
10 matches
Mail list logo
