I use off-site replication (rsync), but having backups on tape is also
important
The tape backup software offers a very thorough incremental and
differential backup solution for UNIX filesystems, but for Windows
filesystems that must be recoverable to a bootable state, I feel that
only raw file
* Message by -Lasse Kliemann- from Sat 2008-05-31:
> * Message by -Madan Kumar- from Sat 2008-05-31:
>
> > Is there any command by which I can get only the updation of file ie only
> > the incremental?.
> > Suppose I have a text file say ss.txt of 3KB in size and I have taken the
> > backup of t
* Message by -Madan Kumar- from Sat 2008-05-31:
> Is there any command by which I can get only the updation of file ie only the
> incremental?.
> Suppose I have a text file say ss.txt of 3KB in size and I have taken the
> backup of this file. Now I am making the changes in to this file(ss.txt) b
Hi all,
I am able to copy the dir from one drive to another drive on local
machine using windowsXP.
Is there any command by which I can get only the updation of file ie only the
incremental?.
Suppose I have a text file say ss.txt of 3KB in size and I have taken the
backup of this file. Now I am
Just saw this thread in the list and thought I'd point out a little bash
script I wrote for laptop users that want to do backups in the office or
on the road using rsync and ssh. Using the latest version of rsync.
http://support.osdn.com/yazz/guppy-01-beta/INSTALL
http://support.osdn.com/yazz/gup
day, February 16, 2001 03:35
Subject: Using rsync for incremental backups and the logfile dilemma
> Hi,
>
> We're doing offsite backups using rsync, more or less the cookbook example
> using:
>
> rsync --numeric-ids --compress --rsh=/usr/bin/ssh --recursive --archive \
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 01:00:49AM +0800, Hans E. Kristiansen wrote:
> I have a related question to this problem.
>
> We are doing backups from PC clients to a Linux server using rsync, and I
> would like change the full backup to incremental backups.
>
> However, the problem is that I may have
Paul Wouters [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes:
> Yes, imagine your nice logfiles being reduced to 0 bytes because
> someone removed them on the server. My backups will vanish as soon
> as rsynch is done (assuming --delete). I'm not using --delete on the
> incremental, but want to use it on the week-old
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, David Bolen wrote:
> Is there a reason that you can't just use a single backup location
> based on a weekly cycle even if you're backing them up daily? (E.g.,
> rather than $DATE for the output directory on your daily runs, compute
> a target directory based on week rather t
Paul Wouters [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes:
> Now, I do realise this is still fairly efficient on our network, and
> that's not my problem. My problem is more the diskspace all these
> logfiles take up. Now I can't believe I'm the first one to have this
> problem, and unless everyone else switched t
Hi,
We're doing offsite backups using rsync, more or less the cookbook example
using:
rsync --numeric-ids --compress --rsh=/usr/bin/ssh --recursive --archive \
--relative --sparse --one-file-system \
--compare-dest=/vol/backup/$HOSTNAME/current $HOSTNAME:$DIRECTORY \
/vol/back
11 matches
Mail list logo
