Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Sat 06 Mar 2010, Wayne Davison wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Tom Dickson wrote:
> >
> > > Is it possible to get a "pool" of waiting daemons, similar to how apache
> > > runs?
> >
> > No, there is no support for that in rsync at the moment. I don't think i
On Sat 06 Mar 2010, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Tom Dickson wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to get a "pool" of waiting daemons, similar to how apache
> > runs?
>
> No, there is no support for that in rsync at the moment. I don't think it
> would be simple to add, but if
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Tom Dickson wrote:
> Is it possible to get a "pool" of waiting daemons, similar to how apache
> runs?
No, there is no support for that in rsync at the moment. I don't think it
would be simple to add, but if someone wants to work on patch, I'd consider
adding it
Hello,
We have multiple clients that are connecting to our rsync daemon, sending a
small file, and then disconnecting. This works well, but rsync forks each
time there is a connection.
Is it possible to get a "pool" of waiting daemons, similar to how apache
runs?
-tom
--
Please use reply-all fo
