-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If rsync computes a different checksum for the same data I would
suspect that something is corrupting the data occasionally. If it is
a disk problem then I would expect one side to be seeing IO errors but
without that I would suspect bad RAM on one en
Hello,
I have a weird issue with rsync randomly marking some files as having a
different checksum (see sample outputs below - run one after another). You
would think it is some kind of corruption / io problem with the files but
it doesn't seem so - I have copied files around, changes source to
dif
Hi !
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:06:00PM +0200, Karl Kashofer wrote:
> > rsync calculates a md4 checksum of every file transferred. Would it
> > be possible to store this checksum for future use, i.e. to recheck the
> > files of each rsync snapshot at any later time ?
>
> The "db.diff" patch in
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:06:00PM +0200, Karl Kashofer wrote:
> rsync calculates a md4 checksum of every file transferred. Would it
> be possible to store this checksum for future use, i.e. to recheck the
> files of each rsync snapshot at any later time ?
The "db.diff" patch in the latest source
Hi all !
I am currently trying to find a smart way to long-term-backup my data.
I currently do link-dest-updates to an external hdd. However, I am concerned
about data corruption in the backup or the original, i.e. corruption of the
data inside the files.
Thus i am wondering if there is a way t
jw schultz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> The rsync protocol wouldn't lend itself to this. Overall,
> rsync is going to be less efficient than a utility that
> simply sends what needs to be appended to reach the same
> length.
>
> I'd have the receiver send the
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 02:30:32PM +, Alun wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I've only just joined this list, but I can't find any mention of this
> idea anywhere else, so I thought I'd just post here before getting too
> deep into programming and possibly reinventing the wheel.
>
> Here at Aber, we
Kurt Roeckx ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Ever considered using syslog, and sending all data to the central
> log server?
Thanks for the suggestion, but standard syslog is UDP and so not reliable (I
know about syslog-tng and friends) and some of the logs that w
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 02:30:32PM +, Alun wrote:
>
> Here at Aber, we have around 30 unix and linux servers doing core services.
> Each one is maintaining its own logfiles and, for various reasons, we want to
> keep these on the servers' local disks, with each server having its own log
> rot
Dear all,
I've only just joined this list, but I can't find any mention of this
idea anywhere else, so I thought I'd just post here before getting too
deep into programming and possibly reinventing the wheel.
Here at Aber, we have around 30 unix and linux servers doing core services.
Each one i
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 04:13:10PM +0200, Niko Nyman wrote:
> on 28.1.2003 15:06, jw schultz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> Would it be possible to archive files on a removable drive, save the
> >> checksums for the archived files, and later compare existing files against
> >> the saved checks
on 28.1.2003 15:06, jw schultz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Would it be possible to archive files on a removable drive, save the
>> checksums for the archived files, and later compare existing files against
>> the saved checksums without plugging in the removable drive? I imagine in
>> theory t
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 02:30:50PM +0200, Niko Nyman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a newbie type'o'question so I'm most probably talking about
> something I know nothing about ;)
>
> Would it be possible to archive files on a removable drive, save the
> checksums for the archived files, and later comp
Hi,
This is a newbie type'o'question so I'm most probably talking about
something I know nothing about ;)
Would it be possible to archive files on a removable drive, save the
checksums for the archived files, and later compare existing files against
the saved checksums without plugging in the rem
14 matches
Mail list logo
